The key word you are missing fraud doc yourself is “causes” of the myocarditis which which would then go on to develop into cardiomyopathy as the article desscribes.
It has to be established that covid or vaccine causes a myocarditis that goes onto develop cardiomyopathy at a rate greater than the 1/3rd the article suggests regular myocarditis may develop into. The article lists other factors that go into deveopment of cardiomyopathy beyond the initial myocarditis state. Cardiac tissue biopsy was listed as important to establish cause.
You are connecting covid or vaccines with a myocarditis that may lead to cardiomyopathy in 1/3 of cases but the article was written in 2018. It hasn’t been established yet that covid or vaccine induced myocarditis will even lead to the type of 1/3rd cardiomyopathy rate that the 2018 “opinion” article(yes listed in the article’s header section) describes.
The article also calls itself a “summarization of studies”. Which means the final opinion summaries haven’t themselves been fully vetted. The article lists no controls or known viral causes of myocarditis well known to be a factor in development of cardiomyopathy.(Cox sackie b being one nortorious example)
Swing and Miss!
I’m not a doctor but a working trauma nurse, 36 years in...but thanks for the promotion.
Oh, a FRurse, my apologies.
I love how you vaxx pushers stick together, it’s heartwarming, or in your case, myocarditis inducing.
I wasn’t linking the vaccine or even the virus to anything.
Your esteemed colleague super MD gas_dr was trivializing myocarditis; both of you (or the troll that posts using your accounts) should know better.The pre-pandemic consensus on myocarditis was clear; myocarditis was bad, and it could to heart failure.
By the way, since when do literature reviews have to be “vetted”? Literature reviews summarize peer-reviewed “ vetted” literature.
Funny how you mispell just like gas-dr does...hmmm