In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 01/04/2023 Vol.444, Q Day 1895, SERKIT wrote: It's January 6th. When is Lucy scheduled to pull the football away from Charlie Brown at the SCOTUS? I've been enjoying my New Year by looking at milestones and seeing how far we've come.
Last New Year 2022, Trump was a year into his ban from Twitter. This New Year he has Truth Social and his account back on Twitter.
I remember posting Biden's threats to have Homeland Security 'crack down' on 'misinformation'; I made his announcement a meme at the top of a Q thread. But within 3 weeks the online community had made a 'victim' out of it leader, Nina Jankowicz.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/05/18/disinformation-board-dhs-nina-jankowicz/
At that time the CIA, FBI, Obamas, Clinton etc. were directing Twitter censorship. This New Year I can read about their crimes in multi-part series, along with those of Fauci et. al., on multiple Twitter accounts, and they are getting attention.
This is amazing given that New Years Day in 2018, the only place you could read anything remotely honest about the corruption pandemic in our government was on a fiesty little Half Chan under constant attack. Anons fought through it all and got the message out (Pepe Paul Revere) and yet, this New Year, people who are accused of being a 'Qanon' conspiracy theorist are serving in Congress.
In 2018 it was common to hear FReepers demand that the board owner end Q threads once and for all. The accusations varied and I'm sure were merely the tip of the iceberg of demands flowing to him privately via email. I think if withhoding donations to drive content decisions worked, the Q threads, which at one time were all deleted because of a false accusation we were posting 'known kiddie porn links' (8ch links), would have no trace on FR. Instead we have, as (I think) Bigg Red said, a 'sanity lounge.'
Control of communications is about the most important military asset there is, that's why the CIA/FBI/China and yada yada yada spent as much time and money as they did seizing it. It is being 'un-seized' before our eyes.
In some ways President Trump seems to have as much power now as he did before. While in office he was hedged all around by traitors, investigations and impeachments. But the news cycle still orbits his pronouncements and even his (non) accouncements as if he were the same hated enemy they claim he was throughout his presidency.
He exposed and expended more of the Deep State's remaining arsenal with his fake announcment.
Had Trump announced something more 'interesting' and damaging to the Deep State Satanists (as many of us hoped), they would have stuck with their lies about Russia supposedly firing on Poland, instead of back tracking and blaming the Ukraine, something their puppet still denies (plans to use in the future?).
Zelensky had previously called on NATO for 'pro-active' missile strikes against Russia, and the false claim that Russia had fired on Poland COULD have given the Deep State their hearts desire - WWIII. But the Command In Chief won, again.
All I've ever seen from the MSM is sneering that Trump's leadership 'lost' the 2022 elections for the Republicans, at the same time I've seen them gnashing their teeth and raving about him, and about those he helped become elected. They forget that Trump is a private citizen because he weilds power well beyond that of a private citizen.
When I heard about the Brunson case I didn't add it to the milestones I've been collecting, because SCOTUS has ignored so much obvious lawlessness at this point (e.g., they wouldn't investigate obvious election theft), so I reasoned, 'Why would they countenance a case that expedites what they, and their Deep State brethren, have been fighting against since Q surfaced in 2017?'
The Truth About the Brunson Case
"The highly-politicized Merrick Garland DOJ is just going to throw up its hands and allow SCOTUS to unilaterally remove the entire Democratic party power base from elected federal office without so much as making an argument? And do so in a case that has been dismissed with ease at every level below SCOTUS? Does that really make sense to anyone?!? It’s absurd, almost beyond the point of comprehension. It’s nonsense."
I don't think strategies like the Brunson Case are merely 'grift'. I think the Deep State uses these efforts, whether well-intentioned or not, to 'expend' our will to fight. You say, "Lucy pulls the football away..." and that to me is a likely perception among those who inadvertently follow false 'milestones' that we keep being offered at the same time we see crimes like the recent spending bill go forward.
The McAfee grift - wherein 'analysts' spread the lie that Q had moved to the McAfee Telegram account because they had to go 'deeper underground' when Trump left office. Moving from a privately owned board to Telegram is not a way to go 'deeper underground,' but oh well. According to one analyst, when the fake McAfee account sold enough McAffee crypto, terabytes of data exposing the Deep State would be released to the world.
The crypto currency sold the 'required' sum; how many anons purchased (hope) in the form of that currency expecting that then the Deep State would be dethroned? We had updates on the McAfee account posted on our threads. The day that the threshold was met, and the terabytes of data were to be released came and went silently. How many were out money, and more importantly, hope, because they falsely believed "Lucy pulled the football away..." when it was never a White Hat effort meant to succeed in the first place?
Imagine if those terabytes McAffee claimed to have had actually been released, when we know the Deep State still has the epic 'distraction' of a World War III (Ukraine) primed and waiting to deploy against any exposure? Russia would (still) be universally blamed for firing a missile on Poland and then the war that the Deep State has been begging for would be on.
Sidenote: I do wonder if the analyst I listened to received a cut of the take on the McAffee crypto as his 'story telling' helped sell it.
But the McAfee grift drained more hope from people. I know we try to tamp down our expectations and excitement in a 'wait and see' attitude, but I've seen the impacts, the despairing comments, that surface. How many days of the week can you run a 50 mile marathon before you get 'too tired' to run the following day?
Our Commander in Chief's trademark style is to counter civil unrest. He does enjoy provoking the Deep State personally, but the overall White Hat goal is to bring about historically unprecedented change with historically low levels of public anxiety/unrest. Dropping terabytes of truth on the sleeping public would not serve the purpose of maintaining social stability, even if it could escape censorship and reach the public.
If we watch the larger White Hat milestones and count them instead of those presented to us by others (regardless of positive or negative intent), we can see the tremendous strides being taken. The Great Awakening could never succeed under full Brandon regime censorship of social media and his 'Homeland Security' Stasi. Trump couldn't post "My Fellow Americans" to Twitter while he was banned. Those are just two hurdles we've crossed.
The exposure of the Ukrainian connection to funding the DNC means more of the lifeblood of the Deep State is being severed, exposed.
The Deep State still has ammo. Putin is beating a lot of it into the dirt in the Ukraine, at great cost in Russian soldiers' blood. Brandnon is trying to shove money at Zelensky to try to prop up the proxy war but NATO deep staters, including the US, are expending military assets in a losing cause, and Zelensky seems determined to expend every last Ukrainian soldier or conscript. That's how important the Ukraine is to the Deep State. I don't believe the Ukraine is their only remaining strategy, but I do know they've thrown much of their hardware and expertise at Putin and that removes it from further strategies.
I believe our military IS intervening in many ways, but we (still) don't hear about it, just as we didn't hear about it back when Q admonished us to look at the influence the patriots were having in Q1746 with the words "People are dying..." as he restated with "Patriots are dying" in Q1964.
Nothing the Brunson case, or the SCOTUS, does or doesn't do can disappoint me. Brandon has little isolated pockets of (evil) influence that make his puppeteers seem more powerful than they are (Jan 6 protesters held in Gulag). His regime controls the courts, but they don't control God, Trump or Q.
Prayers up - may God use all our efforts, and all the efforts of others, regardless of their intent, to help us crush our enemies.
