The US Supreme Court, for reason of congressional “sovereign immunity” from prosecution, declined the Brunson Case.
— Loy Brunson
~~~
However, the Brunson Case is moving already into the perfunctory Step II, for requesting a re-hearing.
Let all this activity sink in and Americans will get a waft of Reality.
Does sovereign immunity apply only when Congress officially acts as a representative body together, through a policy, a procedure, or a vote?
Has no individual representative, or senator ever been arrested, or criminally charged, or judged in a court room?
Brunsons apparently know what to expect.
Was it only Congress the Brunson were going after? I thought it was also judges who dismissed Constitutional Law, thereby violating their oaths of officer S well.
“sovereign immunity” is a straw dog. It does not protect against treason. It doesn’t even protect against traffic tickets that happen off duty. There’s no way it can protect against FAILING to do ones sworn duty. Lazyassness and gutlessness is not a defence.
Imagine this as a classic example. Let’s say King Arthur lied to deceive the Knights of the Round Table. Once found out his head would have been on the side of Lancelot’s sword any flying out the window of the castle keep.
We need swords and firings.
John Murtha, an ex-marine(sometimes there are ex-marines) a RAT rep from PA. was sued by 2 Haditha Marines - Staff Sergeant Frank Wuterich and LCPL Sharret.
In Wuterich v Murtha - libel\defamation among others.
Murtha claimed immunity under The Westfall Act. courts thru the appellate concurred.
Appeals forced that Murtha be dropped from the case, to be replaced by the United States and kicked it back to the district.
Since the U.S. didn’t waive sovereign immunity, district court dismissed it.
The same fate awaited Lcpl Sharret v Murtha.
Don’t know if that counts about what you may be looking for...