Posted on 01/03/2023 6:09:13 AM PST by Red Badger
These are all the things that happened to people in a given time period following the shot.
They are not events caused by the vaccines and only anti-vaxer misinformers try to make you think they are.
Pfizer certainly knows they aren’t and never tried to prevent the release of this list.
Here ya go, troll-boi.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
This is among the stuff the lawsuit forced them to release.
Still, the whole thing is still confusing to me.
-PJ
Believe me, I knew what you meant.
Doctors are renowned for their poor penmanship, which in some cases, sinks low enough to rival *mine*.
But their writing (generating comprehensible sentences) skill is nonexistent.
BS.
This is common adverse event data showing no increased issues from vaccination.
Why would they want to suppress this?
And the hits keep coming, troll-boi.
Your pathetic whiny feeble denials notwithstanding.
Athletes from all over the world with cardiac and other issues after the jab.
https://airtable.com/shrbaT4x8LG8EbvVG/tbl7xKsSUIOPAa7Mx
So?
Do you have any evidence there are more than in prior years?
I don't think you do.
“Since the vaccine, 1598 athletes suffered cardiac arrest, 1101 of which with deadly outcome. Over a prior 38 years ((1966-2004) 1101 athletes <age 35 died.” ~ Dr. Peter McCullough
What about 2004-2020? any stats?
More dishonest idiocy.
That's based on the Lausanne study.
The study that wasn't an attempt to determine the number of sudden cardiac deaths in athletes.
The study that only looked at deaths written up in medical journals when we know, and the authors state, most such deaths aren't written up in journals.
The study that the authors, probably anticipating anti-vaxer dishonesty, said shouldn't be used to represent the overall number of sudden cardiac deaths in young athletes.
It's actually very telling that anti-vaxers keep referencing this study which does absolutely nothing to support their claims. They are so desperate for legitimacy that they try to appropriate a completely irrelevant scientific work.
Sad.
I don't believe him.
Where's the link to this data?
Look for it yourself.
Classic troll technique: whine like a bitch that people don’t do your work for you. Then when they do affect indifference and ever-increasing skeptical demands.
Your dishonesty is not my problem.
LOL.
Make a claim then refuse to back it up when challenged.
Classic internet cowardice.
Umm...nice try.
See, you’re doing they lying troll thing again.
Earlier I posted a source which had conventional news sources.
That wasn’t good enough.
So I posted peer reviewed journal articles.
You claim they understate the case.
Two probleims:
1) You’re a lying dishonest sack of troll.
2) The standards you trolls use constantly shift. Underestimating the number of deaths is just terrible when looking at people who died before the clot shots.
But somehow, vast underreporting of side effects via VAERS, or by lack of autopsies following sudden deaths, or by explaining away the new spate of strokes and heart attacks as due to anything from (yes, you can find the articles) “Climate Change” to “shaking your bed spread too vigorously” is not an issue, because SCIENCE.
Get stuffed, troll.
I have over 200 tabs open, and have had over 1000 different page views today.
I don’t have the tine to track it down. Look for it yourself.
Shove it up your lying troll donkey.
Sideways.
Thank-you for trying, appreciated. Goodnight
Which you didn't understand refuted your point.
They didn’t refute the point.
You’re the one claiming the deaths reported in the journals are GROSSLY underestimating the deaths of athletes in prior years.
PROVE IT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.