True, but in this case there’s no court process or legal proceeding of any kind. It’s just a business owner who doesn’t want certain customers in his properties.
Oh ... I got it. But if the subject being barred from access on a paid ticket were a “protected class of left’s list of aggrieved victims” I’ll bet there would be a court proceeding after the injunction.
Proliferation of cameras everywhere and the actual and potential “abuse” is concerning. Facial recognition is taking this to another level. People have to be informed if their voice is being recorded on the phone when a person calls a business that records calls. But a business that calls you may not record the call without asking the callee for permission to record the call. Leaving the issue aside whether a private interest paid that receives public taxpayer subsidies can use facial recognition to deny entry to a public event ... it seems that before a person buys tickets one should be given written notice and accept the terms of the ticket - that facial recognition is used and may exclude the person at the door.