Let's boil this down to the bones:
Fraud->allows->termination.
Somebody can diagram the whole sentence, but in fewer words, that's what it says.
Fraud aided & abetted by the feds colluding with fakebook (& twttr) to stop posts exposing the Hunter laptop scandal:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4113896/posts
“Fraud vitiates everything” is found in Vazquez v. Dreyfus, and, US v. Throckmorton. So for elections, fraud needs to be proven...but how? Who has standing? Where can this go?