Posted on 11/27/2022 3:22:15 AM PST by C19fan
Church worshippers cried 'heresy' at the Dean of Trinity College as they left a sermon claiming Jesus may have been transgender 'in tears'.
But the view of a transgender Jesus is 'legitimate', according to Dr Michael Banner, the Dean who stepped in to defend the claim made at a Sermon last Sunday that Christ had a 'trans body'.
Dr Michael Banner, the Dean of Trinity College, was backing up junior research fellow Joshua Heath, who displayed Renaissance and Medieval paintings of the crucifixion depicting a side wound that he likened to a vagina in front of the congregation.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Cambridge in 1350, how many angels can dance on a pin head. Now, look Jesus is a T because one of his wounds looks like a V.
If these people could stop thinking about their pee-pees for 5 minutes and do something productive each week, it would be helpful.
So much wrong here, it’s hard to know where to start, but maybe somebody ought run him (I’m gonna assume a pronoun here) through with a sword and see if that makes him think he’s suddenly a T.
BUT THE PRICE WILL BE PAID ONE DAY..... enjoy the fires of Hell!!
I’ve tried to find a personal, background on this guy and nothing. Why would you even post garbage like this?
It’s more like a mass psychosis than just a fad. It seems like yesterday that everything was “gay.” Now everything is “trans.” I think before all of that, everything was Black for a while.
I’m guessing the next thing will be LGBTQP with P (pedos) being the next “special” people. They already say they own your children and can make them trans.
I would suggest that His predators would be the odd ones.
Jesus Himself had no part in causing His Wounds. That was
done by odd alphabets.
Art, a major cause of a good many arguments and correct or not, most artists are earthlings of a strange nature.
Why leave in tears? Are people such wusses today?
That should have angered them more and they should have tarred and feathered him.
Why leave in tears? Are people such wusses today?
That should have angered them more and they should have tarred and feathered him.
You misspelled “with”.
They not only think about them all the time, it appears they think solely with them.
Did anyone tell this demonic son of the devil that it’s a painting from the 1400’s? The painter was not there at the time and it’s not a polaroid picture. More and more I understand the “blindness”. In this case, it is willful blindness. God have mercy on these poor bast@rds.
Entire congregation should have stood up and silently left the church service en masse.
That would have been the most-effective response.
Regards,
There is a humongous Muslim representation in England.
“Joshua Heath, who displayed Renaissance and Medieval paintings of the crucifixion depicting a side wound”
Why would anyone think that a painting from over a 1000 years after an event could be scrutinized in such detail, to provide a basis for a sick theory? They need to study the Bible, not old paintings. They called people like this heretics at one time.
Amen
Satan demands works from his slaves. Just saying “I worship you master,” is not enough.
To satan faith but no bad works is not enough. He has their souls, but he needs them to go out and get him more and more souls.
I planned to say They did more than call them heretics at one time. They have strayed so far that the truth is not in them.
They need to fire the dean and the junior researcher. This is intentional disrespect and mockery. And if they can’t they need to withdraw all support. Do not feed the monsters that seek to offend you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.