Yes, and your post said that all it takes to be saved is to reject the mark.
I replied, in snark fashion, that YOUR way to being saved doesn’t include Jesus.
Reading for comprehension isn’t your strong suit, is it?
__________________________________________________
Straw man, ad hominem and generally not nice, CDY. s&sf said “Those who choose not to accept the mark of the Beast can be saved.” She didn’t say that was ALL they had to do. Your personal attack was gratuitous and just plain mean.
Yet S&S4E recognized the error and replied in a positive way.
Why must you be so divisive?
Can’t we all just get along?
Thank you, Little Linda. That was what the intent of the post. Salvation is up to the individual to believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
Theological discussions, especially when heated, are not appropriate for Q threads. Already discussed before. Just sayin.
Not in any way pointing fingers at you, just an observation.