possible removal of asitting President and Vice President of the United Statesalong with members of the United States Congress (SCOTUS req for certiorari)

Supreme Court Docket ^ | 10/20/22 | SCOTUS

[C210N]

Be aware today is the deadline for SCOTUS to either grant or deny certiorari to the case regarding the desposing of 388 ... including bidAn/Pelousy/Commiela/AOC/Pence

[Guenevere]

What do you think will happen?

[C210N]

It’s just on my radar... I’ll give it 50-50

If it is granted, it will be huge news going into Thanksgiving.

If it is not granted, well, so-be-it.

[Reily]

No! The USSC made it clear that there are “rules” and that it totally lies with the state legislatures. If the legislatures are fine with fraud, then that’s that.

I somewhat like the intent. I want more decisions power, etc. going back to the states. However, consider below ..

I wonder if they would have the same ruling if a racial argument could be made regarding the fraud. That is if there was “fraud” to deny a certain “protected minority group” a fair & free election would they make the same somewhat extreme toward the state legislatures ruling?

[combat_boots]

Yup

Right down to the exact timing

[Fury]

The Supreme Court has no power to remove the President of the United States.

Laughable and incredibly ignorant.

[C210N]

According to a constitution barely being followed. The organic Constitution, as we know it, went under after the Civil War.

[Fury]

Maybe you should file an amicus brief to grant cert and include that claim.

[Guenevere]

Thanks!

[bitt]

p

[philman_36]

IMO, of course.

Every party listed should be removed from office as enemies to the Republic (all enemies, foreign and domestic) for not investigating a matter brought up before the Congress...election fraud.

JMO, YMMV

[philman_36]

Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States, purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this, whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy.

Snip...On January 6, 2021, the 117 th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII. During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and 4 fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.

[philman_36]

See above...
...purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this...

[philman_36]

The Supreme Court has no power to remove the President of the United States.

Here is his argument...

e) Due to the uniqueness of this case, the trial court does have proper authority to remove the Respondents from their offices under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 which states “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. ” A court adjudicating that the Respondents, who have taken the Oath of Office, to be incapable of holding their offices or who have adhered to a domestic enemy, means nothing without such removal of office.

Your argument seems to be simply...Laughable and incredibly ignorant.

[Fury]

My argument is based on separation of powers. The President cannot be removed from office except upon conviction in the Senate or successful removal via the 25th Amendment.

[Hostage]

I have gone to the campfire of the dark side.

That’s where the reality of the rigged system inserts itself and won’t go away.

[philman_36]

The President cannot be removed from office except upon conviction in the Senate or successful removal via the 25th Amendment.

I hate to be an ass, but could you give a reference for that statement?

I don't want to just 'take your word for it', no offense.

[philman_36]

Let's see, a court finds you, a sitting member of the government, guilty of a violation of the USC (adhering to the enemy).
Then, according to you, in this scenario, the very people who just got convicted get to decide on the guilt (impeachment/removal) or innocence through impeachment of one of their own.

Have I got that right?

[Bob Ireland]

***No idea if this will be heard, but if so, could be the tipping point***

Only the 'Rats have the meanness to use this - against Republicans such as Trump!

We are in a dictatorship! Tyrannies are not overthrown by courts or popular elections. Did you notice how SCOTUS ruled that Donald Trump must turn over his tax records to his worst enemies? They will rob him blind and destroy him! Trump has no protection from constant legal barrages and enforcement raids on his personal effects.

Who will deliver him from govt tyranny?

[C210N]

Even with a completely compromised SCOTUS, I can see them granting certiorari in this case.

I mean, with the Deep State so entrenched, certiorari can be granted, case heard, and case decided against the plaintiff.