When infants show low O2 levels at birth, the natural inclination is to provide O2 in order to maintain Sats > 92%. Oxygen should not be provided. This action though seemingly counter intuitive can be reckless.
Years ago, I met a Patient who was blind in one eye from birth. Back then he was probably about 80 years old. I asked him about his condition. He told me that nobody ever understood why he was blind on one side. He said that he was in his late teens when they finally understood the cause of his infirmity.
This was a very nice man and he was quite open about discussing his malady. I liked him a lot.
I have met a number of people who have lived their entire lives contending with different problems that are nowadays easily resolved, but it did require years for Professionals to determine just what was the root of their issues.
Point is that supplemental Oxygen at birth is a complex therapy and must be dealt with by Physicians who are highly trained.
One problem I see on the horizon however is that I'm beginning to wonder if people are losing faith and trust in doctors they may have once trusted?
Once you read what dr. Richard Fleming and so many others have said about physicians and big pharma it leaves a very bad image in your mind.
If you have a doctor that has encouraged you to get the boosters and knew the consequences that's hard to imagine! Why would he do that? If you had a doctor who didn't know what the consequences of the boosters yet he was suggesting you get the boosters,why would he do that? Why didn't he know everything there is to know about the boosters and what the spike protein can do?
Either way,at least for me and possible others I don't trust my doctor anymore.Fortunately, I have customers from every realm of possible occupations. Many at the top of their field. I can literally pick and choose who I need.But not everyone has that advantage.