But people had enthusiasm for Fetterman?
Posted on 11/13/2022 6:34:22 AM PST by V K Lee
The liberals will never allow that.
I agree. You wouldn't think a General would say nutty things unless there was some truth in them, but I remember the stuff he said back then, and now I don't put much stock in the things he says.
Exactly right.
It may go back further, but I recall, during The Kenyan’s first run for POTUS, there was a precinct with only 100 registered voters. 140 ballots were counted - all for him.
But people had enthusiasm for Fetterman?
Also Obama and Clinton got shellacked during midterms, but a much less popular guy with runaway inflation got better midterm results.
“Yes and no. Many Conservative refugees from blue states have moved to Florida.”
How do you know that it is this and not election integrity?
In my FL county there is almost a half million carpet baggers from Leftist states in the last 8 years. They’re all over neighborhood apps and activities. They’re predominantly Leftists and vote D. They are self-assured, smug and self anointed but are still a minority. The county barely went R but due to election integrity laws Ds lost.
Or we can go to VA where my HS girlfriend’s long-dead grandfather is still on the voter roll with his age listed as 124. D of course.
And THAT is the big news out of Florida last Tuesday.
Exactly!!
In fairness to PA voters, the Fetterman/Oz debate was held after half the voters had already voted. Dems and the media kept Fetman pretty well hidden until then. Oz had the momentum late in the race, but there wasn’t enough time to catch up by election day.
When was first day of early voting? When did the debate take place?
Among his base Fetterman had 50% higher support than OZ did in his. so yes, yea they did.
OZ was a crap off brand candidate, period.
If you believe he had a shot at winning you are a fool, or more likely you listened for flappy lipped moron pundits out of NYC and DC who told you how PA “operates” over people on the ground in PA like me who told you the truth but you refused to hear it.
The entire OZ Campaign and folks arguing for the carpetbagging fraud boiled down to “yea OZ is a lousy candidate but at least he’s not Fetterman”… and they think they are going to get more than 2/3 of independents with that crap argument? And those same people seem to not be able to comprehend that the same argument could and was being made by the other side. “Sure, Fetterman’s a lousy candidate, but at least he’s not OZ.”
It’s nothing more complicated than simple math,
46% d
39% r
15% I
A D need only hold their base and get less than 1/3 of independents and they win in PA.. a lousy/mediocre D can win state wide in PA…
an R needs to hold his base and get more than 2/3 of the independent votes and/or peel off a good number of moderate and conservative democrats to win… because of this a lousy/mediocre Republican can’t win in PA in a statewide race…
OZ was an absolutely lousy and off brand candidate, he actually overperform does significantly because of Fetterman’s health meant he couldn’t campaign like he should.. that’s the only reason this race was only 3 points.. had Fetterman been healthy OZ would have lost by 6-8 points easily
OZ was a crap candidate, period. Run a crap candidate get a crap result, period
—> —> But I suppose it’s easier than looking into the soul of our party and asking why nobody is buying what we’re selling.
Since you don’t see massive fraud, when you get a quiet moment, perhaps ask your seeing eye dog if he thinks messaging is the most important criteria when votes are destroyed or overwhelmed by fake ballots…
That's an urban legend.
Click bait. Zero info.
You seem to know what you are ‘talking’ about.
Election denier, fact denier, math denier, or Malarkey denier?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.