Your accusation is false. The only reason I quoted was so people would know which of your content I was replying to. The truncation was just to save time; I did not engage in any twisted reasoning at all based on the truncation.
BTW, did you even notice that I posed the connection as a query not an assertion?
No. But even at that, your reasoning suggests that Mary was baptized in the Holy Spirit, based on the resemblance of the words of Simeon, to the text of Hebrews 4:12. The obvious counter question is, since Peter and the Apostles were baptized with the Spirit, how come nobody talked to THEM about getting pierced with a Sword?
Whypepl and sunspots again.
Why? Where was Simeon when the pregnant Mary visited? Were any of the Apostles there then? ... As an aopologist you are stumbling on your dogmas. And yes, your methodology is all about twisting in order to support the catholiciism dogmas you embrace, whether actually true or not, so long as the Catholic Org of Rome promotes them.