Replies

Great stuff RN.
We may get some traction on the border by the first of the year.Kari Lake seems to have a plan.
https://www.thepostemail.com/2022/10/20/the-kari-lake-plan-to-secure-the-border/
from the link:
Kari Lake's ambitious plan envisions “Arizona leading a coalition of like-minded states in drafting an interstate compact to secure the border.”

Imagine – a coalition of states (not just border states) working together to control the border.

“This compact will call for the creation of an interstate commission, comprised of representatives from participating states, to oversee joint operations along the U.S.-Mexico border, starting in Arizona.”

The Kari Lake document refers to Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which “guarantees protection to the states.”

The problem is that“Washington is outright refusing to hold up their end of the bargain.”

“Therefore, under Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, Arizona will invoke our inherent power to fend off the invasion at our southern border in the absence of federal protection.”

The states would “[a]authorize the creation of a dedicated border security force consistent with state law enforcement functions to engage in joint border security operations.”

This force would be authorized to“arrest, detain, and return illegal immigrants back across the border.”

Kari Lake's interstate force would deport illegal immigrants, actually sending them back across the border – not just ship them to D.C. or New York or Chicago or Martha's Vineyard.

These were clever stunts that exposed the hypocrisy of open border boosters living sheltered lives, but they aren't a permanent solution.

Any real solution involves physically deporting illegal aliens from U.S. territory.
......................
I just posted a mini-version of this on TS.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.512756v1

Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2

“We find that SARS-CoV-2 is an anomaly, more likely a product of synthetic genome assembly than natural evolution. The restriction map of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with many previously reported synthetic coronavirus genomes, meets all the criteria required for an efficient reverse genetic system, differs from closest relatives by a significantly higher rate of synonymous mutations in these synthetic-looking recognitions sites, and has a synthetic fingerprint unlikely to have evolved from its close relatives. We report a high likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro.”