That doesn't imply affiliation any more than my attendance at an IBM or SoftwareAG conference or class implies any affiliation with their companies.
Yes, that's her Twitter feed. It goes back to March 2009. I do understand the time constraints involved with researching. It's easier to just keep repeating all the stuff from this piranha feeding frenzy.
Here is the link to Tulsi's substack article from yesterday, Oct 11: Why I'm leaving the Democratic Party
Here is one paragraph that debunks dozens of posts regarding her position on gun control and the 2nd Amendment:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Today’s Democratic Party does not believe in our constitutionally protected right to bear arms. Our founders passed the Second Amendment out of a recognition that every one of us has a right to defend ourselves and our loved ones, and to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms. The Democratic Party’s hatred of the Second Amendment and their increasing authoritarian instincts pose a serious threat to our freedoms. "Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” Beto O'Rourke said at a debate when he was running for president. Our founders intentionally passed the Second Amendment right after the First Amendment. The majority ruling from the recent Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s law that barred people from concealed carry firearms summarized very clearly why Democrats are wrong to try to take away our rights: “Just as we do not need to seek a permit to stand on the street corner and exercise our right to free speech, we shouldn’t have to seek permission for a law abiding citizen to carry their firearm. We as a society don’t get to pick and choose which of our rights in the constitution are more worthy of protecting than another.” Protecting our freedom to defend ourselves and those we love, and protecting our rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution against a tyrannical power is exactly why we must ensure our right to bear arms “shall not be infringed.”
Still waiting, meadsjn, for you to back up your claim that Gabbard has disavowed the WEF.
Why is she making such a production about leaving the dim party? She’s not running for public office so why doesn’t she change her registration, STFU and vote on election day?
The fact that she spent so much time as an involved dimocrat and running as a candidate for dim president but never noticed how evil they all are until now? Haaaahaaahaaaaa....OK.
During the time she was running for president and having a lot of tv time, she always came across as extremely polished and groomed by handlers. Still comes across as robotic.
I am not going to research the woman because she is a nothing burger whose opinion is irrelevant at the moment to me since she’s not in a position of power.
Time will tell. If the dimocrats destroy her, then she may be sincere.
Thanks for the link, she goes into a lot of detail. Interesting.