“but for now he seems very happy as a woman.”
As Ronald Reagan famously said; “There you go again”.
I understand your comments were focused on the distinction between children having this mutilation forced upon them, vs. adults who choose to self-mutilate, and who in some very rare cases do not regret it.
Those are important distinctions - but that was not what I was calling bs.
What I’m objecting to is the nonsense of calling the mutilation “transitioning” and in your most recent comment referring to a man as being “very happy as a woman”.
Regardless of how happy he is, he is not a woman.
Language is important and the woke Left is hijacking the language in order to advance their brainwashing agenda.
Unless you have bought into their bs, you shouldn’t refer to these tragic procedures as being a “transition” from one sex to another - that’s what the Left calls it, but that is not what is happening.
You are exactly right. There is no such thing as a trans female. That’s a mutilated male. Whether they decided to castrate themselves as adults or not, it doesn’t change reality. They are mentally ill males.
Do we cater to people who claim to be Napoleon? No, we don’t. Do we help anorexics diet? No. So why the acceptance if not accolades for homosexuals and transsexuals?
It’s just sexual attack on and mutilation of children.
That’s all it is.