US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have likely degraded Iran's ability to develop a nuclear arsenal. US and Israeli strikes damaged or destroyed the Fuel Plate Fabrication Plant (FPFP) and Uranium Metal Conversion Plant at the Esfahan Nuclear Technology Center (ENTC), both of which are used in the final steps of building a nuclear weapon.[1] These facilities could have supported metallization, which is the process of converting uranium hexafluoride into dense metal for an explosive core.[2] A nuclear analyst at a Washington, D.C.–based think tank reported on July 2 that US and Israeli strikes on Iran's uranium metal conversion facilities at the ENTC did not significantly delay Iran's nuclear timeline.[3] The analyst stated that Iran could still produce enough uranium metal for a nuclear weapon (25 kilograms) in “weeks, perhaps even days” without these facilities.[4] The analyst assessed that Iran likely already knows how to produce uranium metal, citing an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report that stated that Iran produced over 100 kilograms of uranium metal from green salt at a laboratory in Tehran between 1995 and 2002.[5] CTP-ISW previously assessed that, if Iran were to pursue a nuclear weapons program, it would likely pursue a nuclear arsenal rather than a single nuclear weapon. A nuclear arsenal would require more than 25 kilograms of uranium metal and significant amounts of highly enriched uranium. The Institute for Science and International Security previously assessed that US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran's main enrichment facilities, Fordow and Natanz, “effectively destroyed” Iran's enrichment program and that it will take a “long time” for Iran to restore its enrichment capabilities to pre-strike levels.[6] Large enrichment facilities like Fordow and Natanz would likely be necessary for Iran to develop nuclear weapons at scale.
Iran would also need to miniaturize a nuclear warhead to mount it on a ballistic missile. Iran could attempt to build a simple gun-type nuclear bomb, which is similar to the one the United States dropped on Hiroshima. A gun-type nuclear bomb needs 25 kilograms of 90 percent enriched uranium. The New York Times reported in February 2025 that a secret Iranian team may have been working on a faster way to build this type of bomb.[7] US officials said that the design would not fit on a missile and would be less reliable than a modern warhead. Iran would have to use an aircraft or another crude delivery method with this type of nuclear weapon Iran would also need the facilities and expertise to build even a simple gun-type bomb. Israeli killings of Iranian nuclear scientists and US-Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities likely degraded that capability.[8] A US weapons expert noted that US and Israeli strikes have “significantly” increased the time required for Iran to “build even a non-missile deliverable weapon,” such as a gun-type nuclear bomb.[9]
Israel is reportedly drafting a mechanism to prevent Iran from being able to rebuild its nuclear program following the conclusion of the Israel–Iran War, according to Israeli media.[17] The mechanism is reportedly similar to the US-approved Israeli mechanism for monitoring the ceasefire in Lebanon that allows Israel to conduct preemptive operations against Hezbollah if Hezbollah violates the November 2024 Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire agreement.[18] Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz previously stated that Israel would pursue a “policy of enforcement” to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear capabilities, air defenses, and missile production.[19] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will reportedly discuss the draft mechanism with US President Donald Trump next week.[20] Israeli media added that Israel is conducting “under-the-radar” talks with Russia regarding Iran and Syria, but did not specify what Israel has discussed with Russia.[21]
Israel destroyed a large number of Iranian ballistic missile sites during the Israel–Iran War. see text

https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-july-3-2025
Iran Update, July 4, 2025
Senior Iranian officials are reiterating red lines for Iran’s nuclear program ahead of planned nuclear negotiations with the United States. Iranian Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Majid Takht Ravanchi told NBC News on July 3 that Iran is open to resuming nuclear negotiations but “has no plans to stop uranium enrichment.”[1] Ravanchi noted that the United States will have to “convince” Iran that it will not use force before Iran agrees to engage in talks.[2] White House Envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to meet with Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oslo, Norway, next week, according to two unspecified sources familiar with the discussion cited by Axios.[3] A Tehran-based Western news correspondent reported that preparations are underway for “indirect” negotiations between Witkoff and Araghchi’s meeting, but noted that the meeting has not been finalized.[4]
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz stated on July 3 that Israel must maintain its air superiority in Iranian airspace to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.[5] This statement does not appear to suggest imminent Israeli strikes because Iran would need to acquire new air defense systems to replace those lost to be able to deny Israel control of the air. It is improbable Iran could have acquired or built new systems since the ceasefire on June 24, though it is possible Iran could conduct some redeployments if there are surviving air defenses in the northeast. Katz announced on June 27 that he would pursue a policy of “enforcement” to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear or ballistic missile programs.[6] Araghchi warned on June 26 that Iran would respond to any Israeli violation of the ceasefire and noted that “Iran is not Lebanon.”[7] Israel has conducted airstrikes on Hezbollah across Lebanon since November 2025 as part of a stated effort to prevent Hezbollah from reconstituting and threatening Israel under the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire agreement.[8] Araghchi is suggesting that he believes Israel will attempt to conduct similar strikes in Iran to prevent Iran from reconstructing its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) withdrew all IAEA inspectors from Iran, which effectively ends international oversight of Iran’s nuclear program.[16] The IAEA reported on July 4 that its inspectors left Iran due to safety concerns.[17] Iranian officials and regime-linked media have repeatedly threatened IAEA Director Rafael Grossi, including by issuing death threats, in recent weeks.[18] Iran’s Guardian Council approved a law on June 26 that suspends cooperation with the agency and bars inspectors from nuclear facilities.[19] The bill requires the IAEA to recognize Iran’s right to enrich uranium as a precondition before Iran allows the IAEA to resume inspections.[20] Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei accused the IAEA on June 30 of “mistakes” that had “consequences” and made “bilateral cooperation...irrational.”[21]
https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/iran-update-july-4-2025