Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

As I recall - the new telescope showed that there were a lot more galaxies then previously understood.

Which would mean that they have to recalculate all of the Dark Matter stuff.

I’m personally skeptical of dark matter/dark energy just for exactly the reason that I think we just can’t see everything so it was introduced just to compensate for our lack of knowledge.


3 posted on 10/04/2022 6:24:23 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reed13k

Dark matter is a term used to rationalize the fact the data does not support the cosmological models.


4 posted on 10/04/2022 6:26:23 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: reed13k

“As I recall - the new telescope showed that there were a lot more galaxies then previously understood. Which would mean that they have to recalculate all of the Dark Matter stuff.”

That’s not correct. Dark matter is about interactions within galaxies and their close neighbors. It’s not about the total mass of the universe so more galaxies doesn’t have an impact.


13 posted on 10/04/2022 6:53:36 AM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: reed13k
I’m personally skeptical of dark matter/dark energy just for exactly the reason that I think we just can’t see everything so it was introduced just to compensate for our lack of knowledge.

Me too. It always seemed to me to be a mathematical construct, so to speak, to make all the equations work out.

17 posted on 10/04/2022 7:30:15 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great minds drink alike...me and my baby havin' a hell of a night. - - BB King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson