Excellent post but I was referring to recent posts of debate whether Obama’s wife has man-parts or not and the sordid comments/ images that debate usually produces.
Lots of posters in the thread get tired of such unsavory slides not all voice their dissent.
The original post asked if the image was real or photoshopped. I was looking for a tech fag to analyze it for evidence of “shopping.”
Obama’s wife may be a baphomet. A number of paths can produce that outcome. Should we be able to discuss the data without going hyperbolic?
Even if I don't personally care for an article, picture, or link, I close my eyes and close my mouth. If I don't like a post, I move on. If I don't like a link, I don't read it. I'm certainly not going to stomp on the rights of others to look or read. That makes us no better than those on the other side that work so hard to censor and silence us.
Jim makes the rules. If he doesn't approve, it gets removed.