I have no faith in Charles at all. In fact I knew Elizabeth would sit on the thrown until she died because she knew Charles was lame.
If I was Elizabeth I would have bypassed Charles and sent the crown either to Anne or William.
https://www.royal.uk/succession
…It therefore came to be established not only that the Sovereign rules through Parliament, but that the succession to the throne can be regulated by Parliament, and that a Sovereign can be deprived of his/her title through misgovernment.
The Act of Settlement confirmed that it was for Parliament to determine the title to the throne…
There is a FR member, an Australian who is a friend of Charles. Went to school with him & served in the military with him. He had a different view of Charles. He says Charles has been completely misrepresented by both the UK and our media. A lying media is not a strange concept to us. The only thing we have close to be right about him is his starry-eyed view of environmentalism. Since he’s the only one here with any direct evidence of what Charles is like. I for now will go with his view until I get some evidence unfiltered by both medias. I admit this isn’t likely. Anyway, he’s a constitutional monarch with little to no real power. He’s a national symbol the equivalent of a human flag.
It’s their country, not mine. I’m not going to lose sleep over it.
Elizabeth could not have bypassed Charles. There are succession rules and you would need an act of parliament to circumvent them.