Posted on 09/10/2022 4:28:13 AM PDT by MNDude
Flynn pointed to his own military experiences in his assessment, describing instances in which the U.S government had used information warfare against terrorist organizations such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.
“One of the things that I do know about our government is our government’s ability to project, and our government’s ability to put together disinformation campaigns, psychological operations and psychological campaigns
Flynn pointed to his own military experiences in his assessment, describing instances in which the U.S government had used information warfare against terrorist organizations such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.
“One of the things that I do know about our government is our government’s ability to project, and our government’s ability to put together disinformation campaigns, psychological operations and psychological campaigns
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
Poor Ashli. I sincerely feel sorry for her and those who mourn her. She had a history of enthusiasms and impulsive behavior. There she was on Jan 6, all high on the dope Q was pushing and a perfect mark for that antifa/BLM psychopath posing as a journalist and looking to get his 15 minutes of fame and $ in tabloid payoffs for his video. On the other side of the door, a jittery cop with a gun. Others tried to warn her, but apparently she could not hear them. One of those perfect storm type tragedies. It truly is sad.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3934211/posts?page=196#196
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3934211/posts?page=266#266
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3934211/posts?page=285#285
https://nypost.com/2021/01/14/ashli-babbitt-husband-were-reportedly-in-a-throuple/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55581206
I DID pay.
Premium FlickR account owned for almost a decade.
As if you didn’t know.
Malevolent hosting... They didn’t refund me either, just deleted everything without warning. The second time (expected) was further proof of the first.
~Easy
‘trust sessions.’
that tells you all you need to know. psyop against the right.
Oh look, it's Ray Epps! Welcome to Free Republic. The Fed exit is -----> that way.
I was just trying to soften the blow for the kid. But you went there. https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/563e3a23-e554-4aee-bd3d-7b8a5cbead6d
“Q was for gamers and normies to pay attention to criminal activity within our technocracy (type of socialism.) Which worked very well to get their attention. Which means it backfired in a big way”
Never underestimate the gamers. Normies you can underestimate all day.
“Those who follow Q are now the most active politically.”
Political action is nothing more than yelling at your TV.
Real action is taking to the streets armed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Preeecisely what the evil sobs who stole the election want “us” to do.
IBTZ
It was a tongue and cheek comment.
Just poking the Bagster.
I never claimed Q is deep state. I don’t believe that’s the case at all by the way.
I do believe Ron Watkins ran it after obtaining Q from a young disabled fella who first moved it from 8chan to 8kun.
Also, what’s Qanon? Don’t believe I use that phrase either.
Come on Steve…….get my story right.
Have a great day.
"We’ve known the media are not to be trusted, the government as well, on FR since at least March of 2000 when I first joined up."
Like James Brower said when he explained how Q was created and his role in it?
So what? There are lots of retreads on FR. I have written here a number of times that after moves, change of email address and forgotten password I had to retread. I have never tried to hide it.
The owner of this site or his moderators can look into it and see that is the case. I was never suspended, banned or even reprimanded.
I don’t get why some people here go after “noobs” and retreads. Seems to me, we should welcome new members and returning members. If we don’t, FR will fade away as older members die off or drift away. Don’t we want FR to be strong and vibrant?
It also appears to me that those who point and screech “noob” and “retread” tend to do so when they disagree with that person but have no facts or reasoned arguments to offer, so they resort to silly personal attacks.
Because those people quite often tend to be playing for the other team. Do you really not get it?
Naive or lying, I'd say. Not sure which is worse. Of course, that's just my opinion.
It also appears to me that those who point and screech “noob” and “retread” tend to do so when they disagree with that person but have no facts or reasoned arguments to offer, so they resort to silly personal attacks.
For someone who claims to have been around as long as you have, you just don't get it.
It's not merely a different opinion.
It's pushing the liberal/democrat/DS agenda and narrative.
I have never pushed that agenda and narrative. The opposite. Go ahead and try to find a post of mine where I have done so.
I realize that in your imagination you think anyone who points out the flaws in ridiculous claims made by vax doomer clickbait conspiracy sites is “the enemy”, but that’s hardly pushing the liberal/democrat/DS agenda. The dems *love* for us to fall that stuff so they can laugh at us, discredit us, and point out how kooky we are.
These bogus claims also hurt the anti-mandate cause, and I am firmly anti-mandate. They also obscure valid concerns about the vaccines.
If you think being on the side of facts and truth is not conservative, that buying into kooky conspiracy theories is conservative, well, you have an interesting definition of conservatism, don’t you? Seems to me it’s the Dems who live in Lalaland with their Climate Change, Men Can Be Women, etc. insanities. Just because they’ve gone off the deep end and swallowed nutty claims doesn’t mean we should. We must keep our heads about us in this fight. Facts and truth will win the day, not more whacky claims and conspiracy theories.
Retreads are often people who were previously zotted for espousing leftist views.
And n00bs who come right out of the gate spewing leftist garbage and attacking people are obviously going to be regarded with suspicion.
“What if Q was a hoax created by a group of manipulative people on 4chan/8ichan, and it got out of control?”
On the second day that Q posted, he stated that his message would censored on social media.
8 months later, he stated that POTUS would be asked about Q by a journalist.
Both of these came true. Can you imagine making such a bold statement knowing it would come true?
Q is DJT’s inner circle using back channels to communicate. Why do you think DJT is repeatedly retruthing Q posts, or using “Q music” in his rallies or videso?
See my #237 on this thread:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4092265/posts?page=237#237
And #234:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4092265/posts?page=234#234
And while Q followers and their proxies have attacked me, called me vile names, made ridiculous false accusations, stalked and threatened me, hurled insult after insult, any reasonable person of good will can see I have nearly always refrained from responding in kind and follow FR rules.
I do sometimes debunk nutty claims by the likes of Steve Kirsch and Naomi Wolf and other vax doomers like Robert O. Young, Bryan Ardis, etc., though, and that draws hostility and vitriol from certain quarters.
Why some think Kirsch and Wolf are true friends of conservatism is beyond me. Kirsch, a mega donor to the Dems and Wolf, who went from uber-leftie radical feminist to Tea Partier after her research was discredited and reputation in shreds, then switched sides again to jump on the Occupy Wall Street bandwagon, and now has turned vax doomer grifter — will she turn left again when this ride is over? smh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.