For anyone wishing to see further exposure of the CDC's mishandling of the Covid 'vaccine' program, the following content from the CDC re its 1976 mishandling of the Swine Flu 'vaccine' makes for an infuriating read to those quite familiar with the current complaints about the CDC. In it, you can see the CDC was running the same propaganda & experiment-on-the-public game in 1976, and when exposed blamed the same people and claimed to have learned it's lessons, only to repeat some critical ones again with Covid, almost as if...it was intentional, or something.
Here's what the CDC gave as the primary reason the Swine Flu vax was pulled:
"Had H1N1 influenza been transmitted at that time, the small apparent risk of GBS from immunization would have been eclipsed by the obvious immediate benefit of vaccine-induced protection against swine flu. However, in December 1976, with >40 million persons immunized and no evidence of H1N1 transmission, federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization, at least until the issue could be explored. A moratorium on the use of the influenza vaccines was announced on December 16; it effectively ended NIIP of 1976. Four days later the New York Times published an op-ed article that began by asserting, "Misunderstandings and misconceptions... have marked Government ... during the last eight years," attributing NIIP and its consequences to "political expediency" and "the self interest of government health bureaucracy" (7). These simple and sinister innuendos had traction, as did 2 epithets used in the article to describe the program, "debacle" in the text and "Swine Flu Fiasco" in the title."
The CDC still blames some of its own mistakes on optics and human behavior - claiming the MSM over reported and the public over-reacted.
However, in defending its failures in 2006, the CDC said that overreaction is good when the government does it:
Decision-making Risks
When lives are at stake, it is better to err on the side of overreaction than underreaction. Because of the unpredictability of influenza, responsible public health leaders must be willing to take risks on behalf of the public. This requires personal courage and a reasonable level of understanding by the politicians to whom these public health leaders are accountable. All policy decisions entail risks and benefits: risks or benefits to the decision maker; risks or benefits to those affected by the decision. In 1976, the federal government wisely opted to put protection of the public first.
I'm guessing the CDC is referring to risks to their own careers in this portion of the quote, "Because of the unpredictability of influenza, responsible public health leaders must be willing to take risks on behalf of the public."
We know the CDC changes its online content when the public points to it so I've posted the CDC's content to a thread in order to preserve it in its original form.
Lastly, the CDC includes as a reference, a New York Times article titled, "Flu to the starboard! Man the harpoons! Fill with vaccine! Get the captain! Hurry! "New York Times. 1976 Feb 13. p. 32, col. 4."
It never was the flu that the New York Times article were hunting with harpoons full of poorly tested 'vaccines'.
PS: For anyone curious, Anthony Fauci joined the CDC in 1968.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Fauci
PING
No one in my entire family...and I’m talking maybe 40 people...got any vaccine.
Way back then, my husband and I agreed that one of us would get the swine flu vaccine. That way, if the swine flu killed one of us, our children would still have one parent. Similarly if the vaccine proved deadly. The federal government has tried to panic the nation several times about a pandemic since 1976. Until 2019, without success.
IBFR$$
I was in the Army then and don’t remember getting it but that was a long time ago. Hey, I’m still alive!
I had it going into basic training. One day it was so bad I hid on top of the lockers to aviod PE.
p