More from the article:
“In the Canadian province of Alberta, the leading cause of death is now “cause unknown.” Is that a matter of not finding what you’re not looking for? The deaths from these bizarre clots must be thoroughly investigated, and the findings made public. However, that may be an unrealistic expectation, based upon 1) the massive amount of money involved and 2) the unfathomable amount of crow that would have to be eaten by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, the WHO, CDC, NIH, FDA, plus private and public scientific and academic institutions, if the vaccines were proven to be the cause of these clots.
“If these deaths continue to increase, so will speculation that the mRNA vaccines are causing the clots. For example, do they contain some sort of self-replicating nanotechnology, and if so, are the blood clots an accidental byproduct? Or is this by design — do the vaccines represent a globalist slow-motion “kill shot” for depopulation? These are the sort of firestorms that will be fueled if this issue is not quickly and seriously addressed.”
“The deaths from these bizarre clots must be thoroughly investigated”
“The leading cause of death in Alberta is unknown”
Assuming for the sake of argument that the second statement is untrue, would that not obviate the theory that the deaths from these bizarre clots as a matter of logic?
Further, just out of curiosity, what is the mechanism of death of these clots. I’ve read the theory and it makes no sense. But the breathless reposting of a theory that looks scary doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever. Do you know why? Do you know what the mechanism of death is from a “clot”. The mortician findings cannot possibly determine the cause of death. But of course you don’t mention that.
But what the hell, skip the actual critical thinking inquiry and land on a conclusion.