“The deaths from these bizarre clots must be thoroughly investigated”
“The leading cause of death in Alberta is unknown”
Assuming for the sake of argument that the second statement is untrue, would that not obviate the theory that the deaths from these bizarre clots as a matter of logic?
Further, just out of curiosity, what is the mechanism of death of these clots. I’ve read the theory and it makes no sense. But the breathless reposting of a theory that looks scary doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny whatsoever. Do you know why? Do you know what the mechanism of death is from a “clot”. The mortician findings cannot possibly determine the cause of death. But of course you don’t mention that.
But what the hell, skip the actual critical thinking inquiry and land on a conclusion.
AND, BTW, your claim that there are no incidfents showing up in ERs is way off, Doc.
It’s normative science. And it’s fun!
morticians do not perform autopsies. There is no way they can determine a cause of death. Furthermore all blood clots post mortem