Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd
If you have such a link, you should post it here. I have never called anyone a "mindless Q-bot conspiracy theorist". I have asked you before to stop claiming I have written things here that I have not. So just stop.

Here is a direct quote of yours, from this post on this thread.

As for the Q tie-in, that’s legitimate. After Q stopped dropping and you’d worn out the “Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor and isn’t really dead and it was all fake blood” type stuff, you switched to Covid, then when the vaccines rolled out you became obsessed with vaxx doomers. Nearly every article posted here from some clickbait vaxx doomer site run by grifters was posted by active posters on the Special Q Thread (your little snowflake sanctuary where none may challenge your nutty conspiracy theories about such things Biden’s earlobes, the Pence family’s dead bunny, and Trump retaining possession of the nuclear football to this very day.). These articles claimed the vaccines contained all sorts of preposterous things, including teeny weeny razor blades, tiny mechanical octopuses, wiggly wormy parasites, and King Cobra snake venom.

In my post #308, after posting the photos (and link to website they appeared on, more than you ever do), I wrote "If you did not already, you will have to click on the FR links I gave above to learn about the differences between antemortem and postmortem clots and that yes, chicken fat clots are rubbery!" The links to an older post gave that information.

It's not the mere circumstance of being rubbery. The issue is that if there is a different mechanism for clotting than postmortem clotting, that might affect the chemical composition of the clots.

You might from the original article at the top of this thread:

Mike Adams, who runs an ISO-17025 accredited lab in Texas, analyzed clots in August and found them to be lacking iron, potassium, magnesium, and zinc.

Adams’s lab uses inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, usually testing food for metals, pesticides, and glyphosate.

“We have tested one of the clots from embalmer Richard Hirschman, via ICP-MS. Also tested side by side, live human blood from an unvaccinated person,” Adams told The Epoch Times.

He found that the clots are lacking key elements present in healthy human blood, such as iron, potassium, and magnesium, suggesting that they are formed from something other than blood.

I'm not trying to start a flame war with you. You continually make disparaging remarks about Q posters and say that they are conspiracy theorists, and that is why they are so gullible to fall for the grifters. You conflate people with very little scientific or medical background, with qualified MDs and specialists and pretend all the claims are on the same level ("guilt by association") and do it in the manner of Pelosi's drive-by smear, or the generic smears used by the bad guys in Atlas Shrugged.

You are not nearly so vocal about breaches in proper scientific and medical practice, by those pushing the shots.

The difference is this is not a case of "all things being equal": because COVID is winding down, and the panic is known to be overblown; because all-cause mortality is demonstrably higher for the jabbed than the unjabbed; because the clot-shots are now admitted to be ineffective in preventing catching or spreading COVID; and because there are multiple increasing signals from multiple sources that the jabs are actively harmful.

All that those opposed to the jabs are calling for, is for the jabs to STOP.

And since the COVID "crisis" is over, this should not be objectionable.

Why are you pressing so hard, against resistance to taking the clot shots, when they are no longer necessary?

And why do you link those against the shots to the "gullible people who follow conspiracy theories such as Q"?

The difference, is that you are loudly insisting that ALL opposition to the shots, MUST BE in bad faith.

That's utterly dishonest. Saying "not yet proven" would be one thing. But you go well beyond that. And you insist on condescending to people whose expertise and credentials far exceed anything you can approach, such as Drs. Malone and McCullough.

If you cannot stop, then don't post to me at all.

That's a deal! I will post to others about the things in your posts which are unfounded: containing exact quotes and links, so nobody can claim they're out of context. This is more than you do for those on the Q thread.

361 posted on 09/05/2022 7:21:30 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
I think VaxHerd is getting mad again.


371 posted on 09/05/2022 9:10:09 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson