Let's hear it for peer-review!
Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?
I know: After all the problems with the original jabs, let's roll out a new set, despite the predictions of original antigenic sin (consistent with reports that most of the jabbed are coming down with COVID-1984 again and again, but not the unjabbed), and this time, do it without any human testing whatsoever, but only 8 mice!
Because SCIENCE!™
Get rekt, troll. See, we already know the government has been working with Social Media to censor things which go against the narrative (Lawsuit from various state attorneys general, referenced upthread).
We already know the Deep State likes to censor material (even in journals) contrary to the narrative (cf University of East Anglia / "hide the decline" emails etc., as well as modifying original data *and* attacking those opposed to the narrative, on a personal and professional basis.)
And we know, the Center for Countering Digital Hate, includes LGBTQ+ in addition to Climate Change, in addition to the jabs, as topics they get involved in, according to their website.
So your M.O. is already known.
Cat's out of the bag, Troll.
How about you try addressing my points about these being postmortem “chicken fat clots” not clots that formed before death? See my post #321
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4090724/posts?page=321#321
Personal attacks and deflecting do not prove anything.
Yeah, because we all know what peer review is worth these days, right, The Lancet?????