Don't be so hard on yourself, dear. I'm sure you're a lotta fun at parties.
That’s OK. There are dozens of quacks out there looking for their 15 minutes of fame and many more q nuts willing to believe every written word on the internet that backs up their theory of the day. If someone were really serious they would publish their work in a peer reviewed publication that is well known, not a conspiracy theory website
Thanks. I think the same (they would publish in a peer-reviewed journal, not some conspiracy theory site).
At first, I could find nothing whacky about this doctor and he seemed to be just a regular normal doctor. Then I confess I got to wondering if they used a regular doctor’s name and specialty and just *claimed* he said such things. If caught, they could claim they talked to a “Dr. James Thorp” and assumed it was the real one, oops. Or they looked him up and assumed it was the one with that specialty, oops. They did not give his town, hospital where he pracices, other particulars, so ...
Maybe it’s catching, lol, this conspiracy minded stuff. On the other hand, I wouldn’t put anything past some of these grifters.
You mean like Russell Blaylock did in the NIH
why dont you read it and learn something:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/
And there are trolls like you who continue to push the Pfauci Pfollies.
"Safe and effective".
Sure, if you follow the Georgia Guidestones.
Don't be so hard on yourself, dear. I'm sure you're a lotta fun at parties.
And use their real names.
The irony of you making that comment……..