Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Embalmers Have Been Finding Numerous Long, Fibrous Clots That Lack Post-Mortem Characteristics
epoch times ^ | 9/4 | rodguy911

Posted on 09/04/2022 3:15:16 AM PDT by rodguy911

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-416 next last
To: CatHerd
If you have such a link, you should post it here. I have never called anyone a "mindless Q-bot conspiracy theorist". I have asked you before to stop claiming I have written things here that I have not. So just stop.

Here is a direct quote of yours, from this post on this thread.

As for the Q tie-in, that’s legitimate. After Q stopped dropping and you’d worn out the “Ashli Babbitt was a crisis actor and isn’t really dead and it was all fake blood” type stuff, you switched to Covid, then when the vaccines rolled out you became obsessed with vaxx doomers. Nearly every article posted here from some clickbait vaxx doomer site run by grifters was posted by active posters on the Special Q Thread (your little snowflake sanctuary where none may challenge your nutty conspiracy theories about such things Biden’s earlobes, the Pence family’s dead bunny, and Trump retaining possession of the nuclear football to this very day.). These articles claimed the vaccines contained all sorts of preposterous things, including teeny weeny razor blades, tiny mechanical octopuses, wiggly wormy parasites, and King Cobra snake venom.

In my post #308, after posting the photos (and link to website they appeared on, more than you ever do), I wrote "If you did not already, you will have to click on the FR links I gave above to learn about the differences between antemortem and postmortem clots and that yes, chicken fat clots are rubbery!" The links to an older post gave that information.

It's not the mere circumstance of being rubbery. The issue is that if there is a different mechanism for clotting than postmortem clotting, that might affect the chemical composition of the clots.

You might from the original article at the top of this thread:

Mike Adams, who runs an ISO-17025 accredited lab in Texas, analyzed clots in August and found them to be lacking iron, potassium, magnesium, and zinc.

Adams’s lab uses inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, usually testing food for metals, pesticides, and glyphosate.

“We have tested one of the clots from embalmer Richard Hirschman, via ICP-MS. Also tested side by side, live human blood from an unvaccinated person,” Adams told The Epoch Times.

He found that the clots are lacking key elements present in healthy human blood, such as iron, potassium, and magnesium, suggesting that they are formed from something other than blood.

I'm not trying to start a flame war with you. You continually make disparaging remarks about Q posters and say that they are conspiracy theorists, and that is why they are so gullible to fall for the grifters. You conflate people with very little scientific or medical background, with qualified MDs and specialists and pretend all the claims are on the same level ("guilt by association") and do it in the manner of Pelosi's drive-by smear, or the generic smears used by the bad guys in Atlas Shrugged.

You are not nearly so vocal about breaches in proper scientific and medical practice, by those pushing the shots.

The difference is this is not a case of "all things being equal": because COVID is winding down, and the panic is known to be overblown; because all-cause mortality is demonstrably higher for the jabbed than the unjabbed; because the clot-shots are now admitted to be ineffective in preventing catching or spreading COVID; and because there are multiple increasing signals from multiple sources that the jabs are actively harmful.

All that those opposed to the jabs are calling for, is for the jabs to STOP.

And since the COVID "crisis" is over, this should not be objectionable.

Why are you pressing so hard, against resistance to taking the clot shots, when they are no longer necessary?

And why do you link those against the shots to the "gullible people who follow conspiracy theories such as Q"?

The difference, is that you are loudly insisting that ALL opposition to the shots, MUST BE in bad faith.

That's utterly dishonest. Saying "not yet proven" would be one thing. But you go well beyond that. And you insist on condescending to people whose expertise and credentials far exceed anything you can approach, such as Drs. Malone and McCullough.

If you cannot stop, then don't post to me at all.

That's a deal! I will post to others about the things in your posts which are unfounded: containing exact quotes and links, so nobody can claim they're out of context. This is more than you do for those on the Q thread.

361 posted on 09/05/2022 7:21:30 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

One could only hope.


362 posted on 09/05/2022 7:49:11 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
It is ironic however that those who will suffer the most are the ones that are eager to get every jab. Especially the latest and greatest. Democrats,destroying democrats!! Nothing like a little bit of self-destruction!!

Some speculation here.

I think the population taking the shots is the one tptb didn’t want to.

Remember, President Trump was initially pushing the vaccines and I suspect that tptb were counting on his followers being so blindly loyal to him that they would do anything he asked them to, which is taking these shots with its known to them, consequences.

Problem is, biden gets elected and the shots become widely available and the ones caving the quickest to the Covid fear porn, are the democrats. So now they are lining up in droves waiting for the latest booster to become available.

I actually took a foray over to DU to see what they think and the DUmmies are about peeing themselves in excitement over the thought of getting the latest vax. Several of them were counting the days, literally, until they could become eligible for the next shot.

I think the plan backfired because tptb expected the right to take them because Trump and the left to reject them because Trump.

What happened was that they didn’t expect the right to think for themselves and the left to be such a bunch of paranoid wusses.

Now the left is gleefully killing themselves off.

363 posted on 09/05/2022 8:06:16 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I have often wondered where the elite get their “blood” when needed...do they have a special pure blood bank?

Would not surprise me in the least.

364 posted on 09/05/2022 8:09:31 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

ROFL!

But shhh! Don’t give Bryan Ardis any ideas. Next he’ll be claiming they added Novichok to the vaccines along with the snake venom. And people will start dying three times.

Hey, maybe there’s an evil cabal of embalmers behind the €lot$hots. They can triple their customers.


365 posted on 09/05/2022 8:13:47 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr; SheepWhisperer; grey_whiskers; reformedliberal; ransomnote; aMorePerfectUnion; Jane Long; ..

Godwin’s Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

“ There are many corollaries to Godwin’s law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[10] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin’s law.[11]”


366 posted on 09/05/2022 8:22:34 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Salamander

… when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[10] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin’s law.[11]”


👍🏻👍🏻


367 posted on 09/05/2022 8:27:23 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: metmom

368 posted on 09/05/2022 8:44:27 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD
There are dozens of quacks out there looking for their 15 minutes of fame and many more q nuts willing to believe every written word on the internet that backs up their theory of the day. If someone were really serious they would publish their work in a peer reviewed publication that is well known, not a conspiracy theory website

And use their real names.

The irony of you making that comment……..

369 posted on 09/05/2022 8:47:11 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Yeah, because we all know what peer review is worth these days, right, The Lancet?????


370 posted on 09/05/2022 8:49:10 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I think VaxHerd is getting mad again.


371 posted on 09/05/2022 9:10:09 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Check your FReepmail from me, sent 5:48 PM my time.
It will explain much.


372 posted on 09/05/2022 9:12:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
… when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[10] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin’s law.[11]”

I will follow no law made up by nerds who lose arguments. That's a law that Hitler himself would make.

#DoNotComply


373 posted on 09/05/2022 9:14:22 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Yeah, because we all know what peer review is worth these days, right, The Lancet?????

And so referring to one scholarly journal means…. what?

374 posted on 09/05/2022 9:17:04 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Check your FReepmail from me, sent 5:48 PM my time. It will explain much.

I got no FReepmail from you today. Do those USPS union monekeys even work on Labor day? Or maybe VaxHerds fellow federal agents are intercepting our correspondence. Wouldn't put it past 'em.

We gotta be on a few lists by now.


375 posted on 09/05/2022 9:19:26 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Re-sending NOW.


376 posted on 09/05/2022 9:21:50 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Fury
And so referring to one scholarly journal means…. what?

Awww, look. Furry shows up with more much ado about nothing and tut-tutting, but nary an original idea.

Furry, you are the reason contributions are down.


377 posted on 09/05/2022 9:22:02 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: metmom

If you do not know the difference between a historical statement that is backed up with primary source verification versus the usual ad hominem attacks from the rest of the people you have pinged

All you are proving is that you reside in an echo changer
Btw I look forward to you applying this so called law (which is hardly axiomatic) to your own brethren


378 posted on 09/05/2022 9:22:42 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

379 posted on 09/05/2022 9:28:21 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
Btw I look forward to you applying this so called law (which is hardly axiomatic) to your own brethren.

'Axiomatic' and 'brethren' in the same sentence. Reading you is like reading Homer.

Simpson, that is.


380 posted on 09/05/2022 9:36:17 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-416 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson