Posted on 09/04/2022 3:15:16 AM PDT by rodguy911
I’m not on my horse at all. Recently there has been a lot on these threads about autologous transfusion for “pure blood” reasons. While I don’t think it’s reasonable from a medicine perspective i also 100% support patient choice so long as there is no conflicting data.
I know that autologous transfusion went out the window a while back as a result of reduction of overall transfusion practices once we learned that old blood is bad blood and transfusions are quite risky. Used to be transfusion was quite liberal.
So I thought I would find the answer to the question. Where there it had gone completely by the wayside and why or what the actual story is. Turns out that large academic universities still perform autologous blood transfusion. Long process to get it before surgery and lots of timing issues. But I wanted people to know there was a very legitimate choice and where to seek it out.
Lots of good reasons for it as you pointed out. Zero chance of mismatch reaction. Additionally if transfused back as whole blood instead of fractionated there are excellent properties that would not be seen if banked autologous blood were used
I always try to present all reasonable options. In my judgment although I would not do autologous blood for me personally it is a valid strategy. I want people to know where to get it because community hospitals I am guessing would just say no options.
“ Calling in your back up. They are as trusted as far as you are”
———————————————————————————————————————-
I don’t require back up. I’m a $hit kicker all by myself.
I’m sharing thoughts and ideas with people that like thoughts and ideas.
But apparently you prefer an Echo Chamber without disagreement or discussion.
I had a thought earlier today.
I wondered why seemingly only non-vaccinated anti-vax people know so many (almost always its 3 or more I even heard of 10 once) people in their family or close friends network that had severe vaccine reactions or died from a cause directly related to a vaccine.
Yet people vaccinated don’t seem to know anyone that had more than a sore arm or were tired the next day.
So this tells me that the anti-Vaxxers making these claims have such low creditability that even their own family ignores them. Their friends blow them off and get vaccinated anyway.
Or, it tells me that they are liars and will stop at nothing to advance their narrative and agenda.
So either those people making those claims are consider kooks by their own friends and family or they’re lying.
Which one is it do you think?
My response was to the thread, not to you personally...
I know I prefer my own blood.
What self respecting Irishman wants whisky free blood anyway?
...pure blood ...
____________________________________
You may be a bit myopic.
Hitlerian locution of “pure blood” referred to a genetic trait. No one could choose to be so. No one was coerced into not being so. It was standard Racial Theory based on bloodlines. They also measured the head, proportions of features, body proportions, etc. They did not even posses genetic science at that time. The determination was made on surnames and lineage only. It was however, possible even after surnames were common for those who only had a Jewish mother to sometimes, via moving or just outright lying, to pass themselves off as not Jewish.
Fun fact: German surnames became hereditary in the 19th century. Jews, however, originally were assigned one of only 4 surnames: Gross, Klein, Schwarz, Weiss. (Big, Little, Black, White). Discrimination was endemic in German society prior to Hitler.
“In the distant past, individuals were only given a first name. Most people lived in small villages with small populations, so if you called for someone named Heinrich, chances were the right Heinrich would turn around. However, as populations increased, the multitude of people who shared the same first name became confusing.
Around the 12th century, people began to differentiate between individuals who shared the same name using the Latin word dictus (“called”), or later, with the German genant (“called”), giheizen/heisset (“is called”), den man sprichet (“of whom you speak”), den man nennt (“the one who you call”), and so on.
It looked like this: Cunradus dictus Faber, Heinricus dictus Kreier, bruder Egebreht dem man sprichet der Wolhuser (“brother Egebreht who is called the Wolhuser”), Hans Rot genannt Rotlieb, Heinrich bi dem Bach. These additions eventually evolved into the surnames we know today: Heinrich dictus Schneider became Heinrich Schneider.
These surnames were not always family names, in the sense that they were not necessarily passed down in the family. A son and a father might have different surnames. It was only in the 19th century that surnames became hereditary. By the time periods covered by MyHeritage’s birth and marriage indexes from Hesse, for example, surnames were used for the entire family.”
https://blog.myheritage.com/2020/06/german-surnames-where-they-come-from-and-what-they-mean/
Today, Pureblood refers to those who managed to resist coercion to remain uninjected. Anyone who is so fortunate may at any time be subject to a changed status by being injected, either by choice, thru coercion or forcibly, as was done on camera in Australia to the cognitively disabled.
The impetus for the appellation “Mudblood” is that, so far, those so injected do not seem to _ever_ totally clear the spike protein coded by the mRNA. Originally infected cells pass the code to daughter cells when they replicate. It is indisputably the spike protein that causes clots of varying size and degree. So, the blood is *mud* and so far appears likely to remain so.
This is of concern to the uninjected because of blood transfusions (not available in NAZI Germany) and the phenomena of spike protein transmission from the injected to those who are not.
Sometimes, history only rhymes.
...a problem with peer reviewed research cutting corners, or being done and utilizing normative science. ...
___________________________________________
There are investigations past & present, indicating: paid reviewers with compensation contingent on findings;’ghost’ reviewers who, for compensation, rubber-stamp a paper one way or another without even actually reading/analyzing the study in question. It has been shown in the case of Tess Lawrie’s Ivermectine study that the main reviewer was coerced/compensated to throw shade on her team’s results.
Journals are financed by the pharmaceutical companies. IIRC, BMJ had to admit to their misleading retractions when confronted. Reviewers knowingly omit or minimize their conflicts of interest.
Due to pharma ad dollars, the legacy state global media glosses or ignores all of this. It is well-known while lip service is paid to “Peer Review”.
It is scandalous. It invites distrust.
I was a medical massage therapist for 11 years, my husband for over 20. We worked with/on referral from MDs & PTs. We were so on-board *evidence-based medicine*. Today, I cringe when I hear that phrase. We were present at case presentation meetings. I can report that I was present when a blinded case was discussed. I sat there, amazed at the words coming out of respected professionals mouths, because I WAS THE PATIENT being discussed! I was already a bit jaundiced re: the medical profession and that was bitter icing on the cake.
Later, I told one MD I was the patient discussed. He turned bright red, stammered, mumbled an apology and hurried off. Never worked with him again and soon after returned to the business I had before and had been keeping alive while maintaining a busy practice.
It is not just *cutting corners* or *utilizing normative science*. It is elitism and ego writ large. It is a hierarchy of the self-anointed Elect. It reeks of contempt for the patient combined with a cavalier attitude toward their own shortcomings. There is a practice of reverse omerta, where the prevailing authorities must never be ill-characterized in public and only in a circumspect code in private. And that was back in a time when these men were all self-employed practitioners in solo or joint private practices. I can imagine what it must be like in a corporate environment where they are employees of an institution dependent upon government & Big Pharma support.
And what they have wrought speaks for itself.
The Epoch Times...
____________________
Instead, they sent the videos and slides to their TV/video arm (NTD, IIRC) and invited a pathologist to explain them. It was an extensive interview.
Disclosure: I read Epoch Times and watch their interviews and video presentations. They are honest, but they do respect their readers’ sensitivities because they are a family publication. And the slides were bloody, which is difficult for average people to view.
...there are many reasons people may want their own blood, ...
____________________________________________
I had surgery in 1981. Almost a year later, an apologetic and stressed RN called me (nothing in writing, BTW) to inform me I needed to test for HIV because the blood I received was contaminated.
I tested negative, but the angst, the anxiety, the sense of betrayal was huge. And it took so long to do the tracking that, had I been positive, I could have infected my husband.
You can only imagine my response to the Covid contact tracing program.
https://t.me/GoodDog_USA/10571
Cardiologist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Physicist, PhD, MD and JD, Dr. Fleming testifies under oath of perjury that COVID was created as a bio weapon
https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/O/c/F/A/OcFAe.caa.mp4
also
https://rumble.com/v1iex5j-601-pandoras-box-live.html
at 2:43:00
Thanks for that. I will look for that interview!
My friend has a cousin who has a friend that says that his cousin said this is probably true
... No one trusts anyone essentially from “another tribe”....
___________________________________
Well, that may be a truism, but we are not discussing *tribes*. We are discussing the people and institutions we trust with our lives and health and that of our loved ones.
This is an entire rotten edifice composed of undeserved reverence for _institutionalized_ scientific learning and accomplishment in the medical arts. The learning and accomplishment exist. The institutions are perverse.
If I had to choose (and we all do) between some MD who cannot be separated from his PDR (because who could ever remember which pharmaceutical product to dispense w/o an 8-inch thick reference provided by those same manufacturers) and an RN turned Naturopath who can discuss intelligently the various actions/interactions of a huge compendium of herbs (from which most of those pharmaceuticals were derived) and who, to boot, has an understanding of musculoskeletal structure and function, I would choose Dr. Tenpenny.
And if anyone cares to demean Malone, McCollough, Geert Vanden Bossche, Marik, Koury etc, etc, they can first provide their own CV and accompanying papers published, protocols invented and accounting of sheer bravery for speaking out in defense of their patients and of all humans so far affected by this massive cluster-eff.
The scientific medical profession was used as a willing beard for a colossal biowarfare operation against the entire human race—you and yours included—and the Frontline Doctors, ALL of them, are heroes.
I have watched these people slowly come to the same realizations I touch on in this post over the past 2 years. It was difficult and painful and they still, in true scientific fashion, researched and examined and tested and argued with themselves and each other and challenged the paradigms until the conclusions were undeniable. That takes true courage.
Every single human institution has been perverted and sullied by this operation. As horrific as the results have been so far, if those who stood in the breech had not done so at great cost to themselves, we would already be totally locked into an even more dystopian nightmare than we are.
Go down some rabbit holes if you dare and ask yourself why Fauchi makes the most money of anyone in government. Explore the relationship between NIAID and DOD. Then do DOD & NATO. Then review the attempt of NATO/Atlantic Alliance & Ukraine’s attempt to bring war crime charges against Russia at the UN (hint: they were roundly dismissed) and watch while the real war crimes (start by cataloging the bioweapon labs run around the world by the West) are brought to glaring light in the next 6 months or so.
Internalize this: everything we think or thought we knew is a lie. This is so far beyond what anyone outside of perhaps Issac Asimov in the Foundation Trilogy (books, not TV) could even imagine that most people cannot and will not be able to accept it as reality.
Call all the names you wish. I do not care. I am heartsick and furious and I will not equivocate just because, after all, reasonable people know that monsters aren’t real.
The monsters do not live under our beds, they have run the world for centuries. And they still do.
...whole blood ...
__________
I have read that there is less risk wrt spike protein from whole blood (RBCs). Does that jibe with what you are saying here?
The article’s timeline is confusing. The vaccine has been available for about 1.75 years. Yet, the embalmists are talking about subjects over the past few years. “Few” is usually defined as greater than 2.
Hopefully, none.
I guess the question is what is the definition of demeaning? If questions or comments about their research are made, or questions about their ethics, those are fair game. If we resort to no one can question the “expert class” except experts, that’s a problem.
Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
Creepy clots
Methinks they are setting up a tremendous need for heart transplants in the future. Prolly have lots of ‘willing’ donors from China line up too. Better start pumping up that social credit score to be allowed on the transplant list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.