Replies

Post #35 -- metmom "But broad brushing people is so much more satisfying."

Post #78 weird clot threat -- metmom again "It’s too bad you have walked so lockstep with your leadership’s destructive guidelines for addressing Covid. If you are a real doctor, you could have actually been doing some good for people otherwise."

Do you ever stop to think about what you say, or is it just such a Pavlovian response that you cannot help yourself. Now that I have rung this bell, I am certain I can predict your next statement. I have actually been privately emailing to some what the predicted replies of you and the Q theorists are, and I have yet to be wrong. It is stunning.

All aboard the group think express. And just for your reading enjoyment since you no doubt do not read anything that is not lockstep....

From Lakeshark "I communicated with gd early on during the Covid wars (on FR). I explained, via Freepmail, why I was unvaccinated, and chose to be in spite of my age. I had good health, a robust immune system, nad was hesitant to be a guinea pig with a first generation vaccine. He did not agree with me 100%, but shared that he considered my position to be a solid, and sane one. He also shared that if I got Covid, I should move directly to taking Monoclonals, and as quick as possible. I have been in disagreement with gd in a fair amount of areas, but have never seen him as a shill for anyone, simply as an earnest advocate."

I have now presented to you your very words are in conflict with yourself, and a third party who privately communicated with me and then chose to, after your abuse, share with the forum my very consistent beliefs and statements over time. Things that have demonstrably helped and saved patients all while advocating that vaccines should not be mandatory, and letting the data lead to what is the superior treatment. You keep shilling for Steve Kirsch, Ivermectin which is inferior to monoclonals, and pronouncing great deceits.

These are the facts, and backed up with evidence. SO go ahead, call me a yelping dog again, when it is you who is not truthful.

You keep shilling for Steve Kirsch, Ivermectin which is inferior to monoclonals, and pronouncing great deceits.

At what stage in the infection process were the patients you treated with Ivermectin; did you also use zinc; and did they tend to have other cormobidities?

If you were to say "in my clinical experience, inferior to..." well, ok. Maybe, maybe not. But universally? Naaah, you're not in a position to say that on the basis of just your own patients.