Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ArcadeQuarters
It’s not a vaccine and we shouldn’t fall into the trap of calling ourselves anti-vax. I have all of my traditional vaccinations but refuse the Covid shot.

When all the pro-vax crowd can do is accuse you of being anti-vax, a conspiracy theorist, and Q-tard, you KNOW they have nothing left.

But broad brushing people is so much more satisfying.

Maybe we need a corollary to Godwin’s Law.

35 posted on 09/03/2022 6:01:40 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Post #35 -- metmom "But broad brushing people is so much more satisfying."

Post #78 weird clot threat -- metmom again "It’s too bad you have walked so lockstep with your leadership’s destructive guidelines for addressing Covid. If you are a real doctor, you could have actually been doing some good for people otherwise."

Do you ever stop to think about what you say, or is it just such a Pavlovian response that you cannot help yourself. Now that I have rung this bell, I am certain I can predict your next statement. I have actually been privately emailing to some what the predicted replies of you and the Q theorists are, and I have yet to be wrong. It is stunning.

All aboard the group think express. And just for your reading enjoyment since you no doubt do not read anything that is not lockstep....

From Lakeshark "I communicated with gd early on during the Covid wars (on FR). I explained, via Freepmail, why I was unvaccinated, and chose to be in spite of my age. I had good health, a robust immune system, nad was hesitant to be a guinea pig with a first generation vaccine. He did not agree with me 100%, but shared that he considered my position to be a solid, and sane one. He also shared that if I got Covid, I should move directly to taking Monoclonals, and as quick as possible. I have been in disagreement with gd in a fair amount of areas, but have never seen him as a shill for anyone, simply as an earnest advocate."

I have now presented to you your very words are in conflict with yourself, and a third party who privately communicated with me and then chose to, after your abuse, share with the forum my very consistent beliefs and statements over time. Things that have demonstrably helped and saved patients all while advocating that vaccines should not be mandatory, and letting the data lead to what is the superior treatment. You keep shilling for Steve Kirsch, Ivermectin which is inferior to monoclonals, and pronouncing great deceits.

These are the facts, and backed up with evidence. SO go ahead, call me a yelping dog again, when it is you who is not truthful.

63 posted on 09/03/2022 8:03:39 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson