Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
He didn't look too happy to be in that getup however, so I'll give him points for that.

It was fairly common in those days to have small boys wear dresses until they were potty-trained. It was easier for the mothers (or nannies) to slip on a dress as pants at the time were fairly complicated to take off and put on. Such things as zippers and snap buttons weren't invented yet. So they had to "earn their britches" by learning how to use the toilet properly and dress themselves.

Still, FDR's mom or more likely nanny went a little overboard on the femininity. Mary Janes, floppy hat and long girly tresses? Yikes.

61 posted on 09/01/2022 8:07:48 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (3,986,808 users on Truth Social)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76

I think there was a strong, very idealistic cultural theme of the innocence of childhood in that era, and it was reflected in how they dressed the kids.


63 posted on 09/01/2022 8:11:36 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson