I had to stop and will continue more later. I want to hear more Patel.
Three things about Ivan’s presentation, so far, I was not fond of. One, he repeatedly referred to his former military position in order to bolster his thesis. Second, he said Trump did not criticize Pence until the last few weeks. Wut???? not true. Third, much of his foundation for Pence being the bad guy was who had had likely worked with, been influenced by, sort of “could be”. My main objection, as I said above, is in order for his theory to be accurate, Trump would have been cowed by the RNC, forced to accept someone he otherwise would not have wanted, didn’t have good intel, and is, basically, not on top of things, didn’t know how the US government works, etc.
And - if he knew Pence was a bad guy, why not pick a different VP for 2020? Ivan also bases his ideas on the assumption that Trump was hoping to win the election, not that, according to Devolution, and in fact Q messages, that Trump willingly “let” them steal it, in order for the Great Awakening - people have to see for themselves. I wonder if Ivan is a Qer.
I heard Ivan say that Trump had no choice in the matter of Pence as VP. The republican establishment was not behind Trump. I think he said that Trump only had 40 percent support from republicans. Ryan, and McConnell and others would only support Trump if their guy was VP.