DNA similarities between creatures does not prove complex creatures evolved from simple ones. The creator could reuse code and package DNA any way He wishes.
Your response offers no evidence that complex creatures evolved from simple ones.
All physical evidence confirms evolution theory, none of it falsifies evolution -- that is a fact.
The evidence can also be said to support special supernatural creation, but that is not a scientific explanation and should not be taught as science.
Supernatural creation can be taught in classes devoted to a child's family's specific religious denomination.
plain talk: "Your response offers no evidence that complex creatures evolved from simple ones."
By that you mean you closed your eyes and refused to see what is there right in front of you.
And that is your right, you don't have to see the obvious.
But you can't call your blindness "science", because by US law, it's not.
One would expect biochemical similarities in creatures of similar type and complexity in a given chemical and physical environment, as that is essential to survival. That does not imply a hereditary relationship.
For example, the dosage of Ivermectin to rid horses and humans of parasites is the same: 0.2 milligrams per kilogram of body weight, and since those bodies are mainly water, that means the serum levels, in order to be effective, are very much the same. Yet, though the drug will eliminate parasites in either, no one claims humans and horses to have evolved one from the other.