Well you know. A lot of religious scholars looked into the Prophets writings at the time Jesus walked the earth and could not see any reference to HIM being who HE claimed.
I offer this just to say, just because no one noticed before, does not mean I am wrong.
It is easy to prove me wrong.
I offer it aa a reasonable argument, one that deserves a response.
Tell me please, what sport team is willing to go into a competition with another team and only allow their players to drink water, while the players for the opposing teams can drink as much gatorade as they so desire?
If I am wrong on the effect it had, then all one has to do to prove me wrong is try my experiment in a true completion.
Hell, I do not know of a player that would agree to it.
Yet my challenge stands, and it’s an easy one to disprove.
IF I am wrong.
funny but as a kid on the swim team we ate powdered jello packets with the water we drank at swim meets. That would be about 62 years ago.
For this to have been a planned “cheat” of some sort means that the New Orleans NFL team running the game provided Gatorade to one team and intentionally withheld it from the other. Your account does not say that is what happened. Instead, your account says the Chiefs provided their players with a water substitute that no one in the NFL objected to as illegal or improper.
You feel that the Chief’s readiness to try a new thirst quencher was improper and I say it was intelligent anticipation of the demands that they forecast for a game day.