You mean like the University of London epidemiologist who was predicting 10s of millions dead from COVID, and recommended lockdowns while he snuck off to bang his mistress?
You mean like "safe and effective" with the quoted efficacy rate dropping from the mid-90s to the 30s ("those Beagles had it coming")?
Or Birx admitting she knew jabbing does not matter, before the jabbing started?
Or the fact the HHS and CDC knew of OTC medications which was used originally for sickle-cell anemia, that saved 85% of people who were on freaking VENTILATORS?
Or the use of Remdesivir ("RunDeathIsNear") despite the fact it was pulled from a study on Ebola, because it was so harmful? How bad does it have to be that letting Ebola progress was considered preferable to giving it?
Get wrecked, troll.
Epidemiologists are not physicians. So stroke one
CDC And HHs are government. Not physicians. Strike two
An OTC for sickle cell? Ok. I am game to hear what saved 85% of patients. On ventilators. I am really really sure there was no such critter Strike Three
Remdesevir was ineffective. Never used it much myself nor others in my profession. But let’s not be to hubris. It was not pulled because Ebola was preferable as you insinuate. Strike Four
You have shared with me some of the challenges you have had. But the descent into calling people with whom you disagree trolls and not using your God given reason instead parroting the insanity of certain bots around here is beneath you.
You very nicely augmented my profession to mostly non-physicians. Not your best effort.
The only trolls around here are the galactically unoriginal on trick point insult artists who couldn’t recognize a cogent argument let along debate beyond mind numbed talking points. You are not one of those.
Do better.