I'm not claiming anything. I quoted the authors telling you the dataset is incomplete by design.
They weren't even attempting to count the total number of SAD deaths.
And no one said the data is unreliable, provided you rely on it to do what the authors intended.
...there is no reason to believe that the sources for the Lausanne data will suddenly report adverse effects *honestly*.
Ah. We've come to the logical conclusion of this discussion. "If the data disagree with my thesis the data are made up and everyone is conspiring against me".
Do you ever recall any year in which so many athletes at the professional level, collapsed and/or died on the field? I don't.
Me neither, but I never paid much attention to it and anti-vaxers weren't posting about every death that occurred pre-Covid.
No matter, our recollections are interesting, but not evidence.
Spoken like the lying sack of troll that you are.
Typical Fedophile neurolinguistic programming.
Introduce the word "conspire" and voila! -- "conspiracy theorist".
Instant disqualification.
Problem is, there really was a conspiracy.
Starting with the weaponization of a SARS virus by selectively modifying the spike protein: not just the genetic sequence, but the codons used to create that sequence, were those typically used by humans, rather than bats. Oops.
Those who wished to make COVID into a crisis, and those who pushed the clot shots, not only lied, but demonstrably exerted enormous pressure on others to lie.
Me neither, but I never paid much attention to it and anti-vaxers weren't posting about every death that occurred pre-Covid.
The deaths at the professional level *weren't occurring*.
An athlete collapsing mid-event ALWAYS gets noticed.
Sod off troll.