Here's what is actually written on page 70 of Moderna's filing with the SEC:
----
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism. In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical trials and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established, may be different from those required for gene therapy products, or may require safety testing like gene therapy products. Moreover, the length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and to submit an application for marketing approval for a final decision by a regulatory authority varies significantly from one pharmaceutical product to the next, and may be difficult to predict. [bold mine]
Link: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-20200630.htm
--------
So you cherry picked that sentence without giving the context. Whatever you need to do for/about a product within the government bureaucracy, you need to list a product class. Many regulations are keyed to product class. Trademarks are keyed to product class, too. Because mRNA vaccines are new, and mRNA is one ingredient of gene therapy, which is not new, it had been already classed as a gene therapy product by the bureaucracy. It does not mean the vaccines are gene therapy.
Of course pharmaceutical companies made a big profit. That's the reason they're in business. And they have stockholders to answer to.
What about these pharmaceutical industry cash cows?
Humira (adalimumab): $13.6 billion/yr
Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir): $10 billion/yr
Enbrel (etanercept): $7.4 billion/yr
Do you think these are harmful?
Sure, the vaccines earned their makers even more, but how long will that last? Moderns is optimistically expecting $19 billion in sales for its Covid vaccine for the entire year of 2022. But how much will it be in 2023?
Yes, it's wrapped in a lipid envelope to keep it from degrading. The lipid used also acts as an adjuvant.
Yes, and viruses naturally have mRNA. Cows are natural. Is a filet mignon cut out of the cow and wrapped in porcine lipid unnatural and harmful?
Viruses enter our cells and alter them and turn them into little virus factories:
The ideas about the vaccines you espouse are very much in line with the stuff posted here from Stew Peters and The Expose and JD Rucker's NOQ Report. You post links to things about "QAnon Doc" Carrie Madej who claims the vaccines contain bio-sensing nanomachines designed to alter human DNA and control people’s minds (along with the usual Q stuff about the global elite pedophile ring and so on):
https://www.vice.com/en/article/88avy5/a-qanon-doctor-who-spoke-at-the-capitol-riots-said-the-covid-vaccine-is-a-witches-brew
And also posted a link to this interview of David Martin (who does not have a medical degree), who is also into "Climate investing" -- so it looks like he's grifting off both the antivaxxer doomers and the climate doomers. Nothing like a good doom merchant! He was in the "Plandemic" video, too.
https://usawatchdog.com/up-to-700-million-worldwide-will-die-from-cv19-vax-by-2028-dr-david-martin/
So you place your trust in the likes of these people. Just because Fauci and Birx turned out to be untrustworthy in a number of respects does not mean the vaxx doomers are trustworthy. I don't trust much of what I read in the MSM either, but that doesn't mean I have to think the World Weekly News' Bat Boy is real. Or David Icke's lizard people.
What "massive deleterious effects of the jabs"? Where is your proof of that?
Go get bent troll.
You note that you bolded yourself that the FDA considered the clot shots a gene therapy.
Therefore, that's a reputable, official government source saying so; quoted by one of the clot-shot companies themselves.
Back in 2020.
Before you trolls came out of the woodwork attempting to discredit anyone standing against the clot shots -- because they hadn't been massively distributed, nor had many companies and the government attempted to force people to take them.
So all the rest of your attempted ad hominem is meaningless, and knowingly dishonest.
I wasn't cherry picking. It was an admission against interest by the company.
And they dig their own hole a little deeper in the next few sentences:
" In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain. The number and design of the clinical trials and preclinical studies required for the approval of these types of medicines have not been established, may be different from those required for gene therapy products, or may require safety testing like gene therapy products. Moreover, the length of time necessary to complete clinical trials and to submit an application for marketing approval for a final decision by a regulatory authority varies significantly from one pharmaceutical product to the next, and may be difficult to predict."
Yeah, they cut the hell out of the testing time -- REAL vaccines allow around 10 years for adverse events to manifest themselves. And sent out a legion of flying monkeys to cover up the signals being sent through VAERS.
And (laughs in American) -- so what if the company says their jab is not a gene therapy? It involves adulterated mRNA to cajole the body into making a foreign protein: and at that, not a natural foreign protein, but one where the sequence of the spike has been changed to stabilize it, in the conformation it has before fusing with the target cell.
The only excuse they have, is that it's not a therapy at all. Retrospective results prove that it does not prevent severe infection, and contrary to grandiose claims, cannot prevent either transmission, OR infection with subsequent strains: in fact it seems to prime the body to make additional antibodies to the injection-created spike protein, rather than reacting to whatever natural strain is out there.
Not to mention, why did these ding-dongs concentrate on something which would spread spike protein throughout the body, when
a) the spike protein is the harmful part of the virus
b) the nucleocapsid proteins in the virus are conserved far better from one strain of the virus to another
For the profit? They don't exist to make a profit.
They exist to make a profit within the law, while making products which do more good than harm, for which there are no cheaper, less expensive alternatives.
Otherwise, you get with medicine what you did with the early Pintos, where the company KNEW IN ADVANCE of the design flaw which caused the car to be liable to leak fuel and catch fire when rear ended; and for which emails among the executives showed they knew, and they decided to go ahead and produce the car and try to buffalo victims in court, rather than pay the $11/car it would take to solve the problem.
Kind of like all the adverse effects from the jabs themselves. You know the ones that even in the abbreviated clinical trials, were so bad, that Pfizer tried to get the results of their trials sealed for 75 years.
For the lipid envelope, it had to be specially engineered to not mess up the artificial mRNA it was carrying, while remaining stable enough to be transported in the body, AND to effectuate entry of the mRNA into the cells.
The people who were busy wrenching their own arms out of their sockets from patting themselves on the back so hard for getting stable lipid nanoparticles, failed to think about (or maybe the jab manufacturers ordered everyone to be quiet about) the transport of the LNPs far from the site of the injection: including crossing the blood-brain barrier.
There was a whistleblower from Pfizer who published internal results about that, as I recall.
And you're lying through your foul teeth when you say "I put my trust in" (a long list of strawmen articles you posted.)
If you bother to pull your head out of your ass, you can find I was posting to articles from Nature, The Lancet, The British Medical Journal and NEJM.
And you give yourself away by trying to link this to Q; there are sites which have saved all the Q posts, and Q does NOT emphasize or concentrate on the jabs. Out of over 4500 posts, only three (3) even contain the word "vaccine."
And I love this quote of yours:
"Just because Fauci and Birx turned out to be untrustworthy in a number of respects does not mean the vaxx doomers are trustworthy."
The vax doomers didn't have the full force of government, nor daily coverage in the MSM trumpeting and echoing everything thing they said.
But Birx and Pfauci DID. And they knowingly pushed the jabs, knowing them to be useless.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/dr-deborah-birx-knew-covid-vaccines-not-protect-against-infection
She also admitted that 50% of those who died from omicron were both older and fully vaccinated.
But it gets worse.
Here's the first paragarph of a recent article from Virology Journaln (BMC Part of Springer Nature):
Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. The decrease in immunity can be caused by several factors such as N1-methylpseudouridine, the spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, antibody-dependent enhancement, and the original antigenic stimulus. These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles.
Note that -- not just immune response to COVID-1984 variants, but overall immunity is impaired by the clot shots.
Get rekt, troll.
