All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

substack.com ^ | June 10, 2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

[ransomnote]

A few days ago I posted an article suggesting the mRNA vaccines were causing a spike in disability. Since that time the story has gone viral, I’ve had more time to look at the data, others have as well, and I now feel the case is very strong. Because this message is critically important, I am writing a second follow up article on the topic. In this article I will attempt to present a comprehensive analysis, and put the data into context with my experience of having worked with individuals with COVID vaccine injuries and individuals with varying degrees of disability including those seeking disability.

The initial discover of this dataset was Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout). He shared this dataset (which can be verified here):

Let’s quickly annotate that to put it into context:

 

MORE AT LINK: All Evidence Suggests The COVID Vaccines are Causing a Spike in Disability and a Potential Catastrophe for Our Economy

 

[bagster]

Maybe you otter take another look at that critter...

What? I augmented my study of walruses and zoology by watching several episodes of Tennessee Tuxedo (on my own time).

I did a paper on it. I guess I know what I'm talking about.

[rodguy911]

Your graph is excellent. Add in the vaers reports which are vastly understated at least 31X accd. to expert in the field dr. Jessica Rose from Israel and you have the evidence you need.

[rodguy911]

The vaccine is no vaccine.It's a bio weapon designed here and in China to alter DNA and destroy or greatly weaken human immune systems.
There are so many varieties of shots,over 2,000, its impossible to standardize what will happen to people.Major league problems are on the horizon for anyone who has had one or more of the bio-weapons attacks on their bodies.

[rodguy911]

Once again there are no vaccines only bio-weapons of varying intensities unknown to all but a few. Stats show that 5% of the shots do 90% of the damage. Covid is a huge problem but the bio-weapon shots are far more damaging.

[rodguy911]

excellent post you have their number.

[rodguy911]

All these over-the-top claims about preposterous things in the vaccines, claims they give you monkeypox, make you magnetic, make you subject to mind control by Bill Gates via 5G and on and on is a whole lot of crying wolf.

Maybe you should do a little research on a guy named dr. CHarles Lieber of Harvard U. He has worked for the chicoms for 20 years and is a nano expert. He has 66 patents on turning humans into part man part machine or cyborgs. You might be surprised what you can learn.

[CatHerd]

No, you are the one who does not get it. It’s not a case of lousy record keeping on Pfizer’s part. It’s a case of lousy research on the part of Naomi Wolfe and her “crowdsourced” researchers.

Naomi Wolfe has her “crowdsourced project” going through the 30,000 pages of Pfizer documents and they made grave errors. These are glaring errors, but Wolfe failed to notice them when announcing their erroneous finding that 44% of vaccinated pregnant women miscarried.

Error #1: They found the page with the table listing the 11 women who miscarried in the “all adverse events” section. And they found the the page with the table listing those same 11 women in the “serious adverse events” section. Being lousy researchers, they failed to notice it was the same 11 women, same 11 miscarriages, and added the two tables together, claiming there were 22 miscarriages — but actually there were only 11.

Error #2: They found the table listing the 50 women who became pregnant after the first dose and assumed this was the total number of pregnant women enrolled in the study, a wrong assumption. They also failed to notice that only 3 of the 11 women who miscarried are listed among the 50.

Therefore, there must be a table listing women who became pregnant at some other time which Naomi’s “researchers” have not found yet among the 30,000 pages. It is highly likely a number of women did not yet realize they were pregnant when they were enrolled in the study, and so were pregnant before receiving the first dose. The “missing” 8 women must be in this group, and hence are not on the list of 50 who became pregnant after receiving the first dose. (Note that pregnant women were excluded from the study, so these women would not have participated in the study had it been known they were pregnant at the time of enrollment.)

Without the missing table of women who were already pregnant when they received the first dose (which likely includes the 8 women missing from the list of 50 who became pregnant after receiving the first dose), we cannot know the total number of pregnant women in the study. All we know is that of the 50 women who reported they were pregnant after the first dose, 3 miscarried.

Perhaps Naomi’s “researchers” will find that table and correct the error. Or perhaps not. Naomi got her “Massacre!” headline on Will Witt’s website that dupes then spread on social media.

At least this “Berberina on Gettr” who posted the erroneous “finding” that “44% of pregnant women miscarried” on Wolfe’s website noted that others had called out the errors, as you can see:

https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-misleadingly-classified-multiple-miscarriages/

Other people can see and understand the errors made by Wolfe and her “crowdsourced project”. Why can’t you? Phil Kerpen spells it out and provides the Pfizer tables so you can check for yourself. Here is the link again:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

>>>>Re your “And if the records are so lousy that they’re losing track of 8 of 11 miscarriages, what good is the study in the first place?”<<<<

Pfizer did not “lose track” of those 8 women. As I spelled out in my earlier post and again in this one, those 8 women are not among the subset of 50 women who reported they became pregnant after receiving the first dose. Therefore, they must be among the women who became pregnant before receiving the first dose, but did not yet realize it at the time. Naomi’s “researchers” have either not yet found the page(s) listing these women, or they failed to disclose this information.

>>>>Ref your “they only cover women who get the jab less than 20 weeks’ gestation.”:

Well of course they did. By definition, a miscarriage is “spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the 20th week”:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pregnancy-loss-miscarriage/symptoms-causes/syc-20354298

>>>>Re your “2) they only looked for abortion within 28 days of the jab.”<<<<

I agree it would have been better to monitor the women until they passed the 20th week of pregnancy. The researchers probably reasoned that if the vaccines were responsible for elevated risk of miscarriage, it would occur within 28 days of receiving the vaccine, as the spike proteins would have been cleared from the body well before 28 days.

>>>>>Re your “3) The adjusted odds ratio was 1.02 for abortion if women got the jab.”

Yes, a 1.02 odds ratio is basically a wash. No statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Okay, so you don’t like “muh JAMA” (yet promote and defend Naomi Wolfe’s hot mess of a “crowdsourced project” — go figure). You seemed to think highly of the Virology Journal with the letter to the editor by the Japanese doctor, and noted it was a BMC Nature journal in your post #150 on this thread, so how about this meta analysis from Nature:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30052-w?s=09

Oops, it uses the same two studies on miscarriage risk.

Speaking of the Virology Journal and The Lancet, you surely remember posting it to me in your #150 and to Semimojo in your #151.

My response in my #173: “The Virology Journal “article” you touted is not peer-reviewed article, but a letter to the editor of said journal by Kenji Yamamoto, a Japanese doctor (link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167431/ ). The Lancet study is the one he cites to support his statement that “the study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals eight months after the administration of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals” in his footnote 1, but this is a gross misunderstanding or misrepresentation of that study, perhaps a translation error. The Lancet study absolutely DOES NOT support your assertion that “not just immune response to COVID-1984 variants, but overall immunity is impaired by the clot shots.”

If you bother to check out The Lancet study yourself, you will find it says no such thing. It does show the vaccines’ efficacy wanes considerably over time, especially in the elderly (and recommends boosters). While the study does show immunity to the Covid virus lessens over time as vaccine efficacy wanes, there is never any claim or question that overall immune function is depressed.”

Funny you would post that twice and never get around to checking the Lancet study and too ashamed to admit it. You needn’t be though. Wayne Root and Gateway Pundit didn’t bother to check either. (Not surprising, as they also neglected to check cause of death of the celebrities Root insinuated died of the vaxx: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4080412/posts?page=202#202 )

So how about it? Here’s the link to the Lancet article:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35131043/

[semimojo]

It’s a case of lousy research on the part of Naomi Wolfe and her “crowdsourced” researchers.

Thanks for this. I knew Wolf's claim was a BS misrepresentation of the Pfizer data but didn't bother digging in to see how she did it.

I must say, she's one of the most egregious grifters out there because it's clear she knows better but keeps harvesting donations and selling books.

...a letter to the editor of said journal by Kenji Yamamoto, a Japanese doctor...

Not just a doctor, he works in the varicose vein surgery unit!

[CatHerd]

You are most welcome. It was a courtesy ping because I mentioned you in reference to the Lancet study that Greywhiskers posted in a reply to you.

Yeah, Naomi is a real piece of work. After she was called out by her peers for shoddy research resulting in false conclusions in her own supposed field of expertise (radical feminism) beginning with her thesis and then one of her books, and her last book was so riddled with errors her publisher had to pulp all copies, she started jumping on passing bandwagons to get attention. First she veered right and went Tea Party. Then made a sharp left turn and went all in on Occupy Wall Street.

Along the way she started spouting nutty conspiracy theory stuff. For instance, she claimed that ghastly ISIS video showing them beheading the two Americans and two British was a fake created by the CIA and the poor headless guys and their families were all actors, and that American military sent to Africa to help out during the Ebola outbreak were actually being sent there to bring Ebola back to the US to start an epidemic here and topple the government.

Now she’s jumped on the vax doomer bandwagon. When this finally peters out, who knows, she may turn left again.

I didn’t pick up on the varicose vein clinic thing, so thanks for that. My beef is not so much with Dr. Yamamoto or his credentials as with his gross mischaracterizations of studies he cites to support claims he makes. Perhaps it’s a language/translation thing coupled with confirmation bias.

[David Chase]

Doesn’t matter what I say or what you say.

Action (or in this case web-site traffic and donations) speak louder than words.

Inject the waaaaaay off topic NIH, Fauci, CDC……..whatever, all you want.

The comment wasn’t about that. But you know that, and chose to pretend I spoke about something you have well worn out clever sayings about.

Then, to celebrate and pat each other on the back for the continued behavior that has resulted in less site visits, less interaction and donations, y’all run off to the Q Thread.
Just like cry baby Millennials running off their Safe Space.

[David Chase]

Ahhh yes…..the Motor City Mad Man.

The guy that was a Covid denier, then got so sick he thought he was going to die. Had Doctor friends visit him and used their Private Jet to take him from Texas to Colorado for Covid treatment.

The thing I always liked about Uncle Ted is his strong 2nd Amendment beliefs.

That’s about it……….

[David Chase]

Your ability to stand your ground and comment to dismiss my observation isn’t up to snuff as you run away to the Q Thread and get brave there.

Everyone knows full well I’m not allowed on the Q Thread.

So like a Millennial needing their Safe Space you head off to yours.

Please, Stay there.

Sign,
MURSE

[bagster]

Are you two vax pimps still yammering on?

Take your ass whoopins like a man and trundle off to support your deep state government somewhere else already. The covid/vax is beyond your powers to save.

#WeKnow

[David Chase]

I heard that if when an intern master’s using PAPs they become certified and get a PAPs Blue Ribbon award……..

I did my own research and found it all on www.make.stuff.up.com/respiratory

[bagster]

Doesn’t matter what I say....

We can agree on that much.

Inject the waaaaaay off topic NIH, Fauci, CDC……..whatever, all you want.

Wait. Your whole bitch-baby routine is based on 'vaxxer' vs 'anti-vaxxer'. 'NIH, Fauci, CDC...whatever' don't get no more about that than anything. They are the ones who you defend with every weak ass argument you make.

And on that note, perusing this thread from ten thousand feet, when you chime in it's like a child speaking up at the grownup table. It's rude for small minds to interject themselves into the conversations of their betters.

Respect your intellectual superiors. Children should be seen and not heard. And in your case, the less seen the better.

Then, to celebrate and pat each other on the back for the continued behavior that has resulted in less site visits, less interaction and donations, y’all run off to the Q Thread. Just like cry baby Millennials running off their Safe Space.

If butt-hurt could talk, it would say exactly that. You are still sad that you got rolled up off the Q thread when you were in troll mode.

Your squealing is tired. Be a man.

[David Chase]

“ Now she’s jumped on the vax doomer bandwagon. When this finally peters out, who knows, she may turn left again.”
————————————————————————————— ———————

I have said that and believe that.

She goes where the best Grifting can be had.

The Anti-Vax loons would bestow a Hero title on Jeffery Dalhmer if he agreed with their assertions.

[bagster]

Everyone knows full well I’m not allowed on the Q Thread.

Cause you're a troll bitch. Learn to mind your manners and maybe one day you may be allowed to hobnob with the elite.

Until then, you are anathema. Scorned, cast out, and shunned.

#BegoneFoulDwimmerlaik

[bagster]

I did my own research and found it all on www.make.stuff.up.com/respiratory

A site vax_dr, semiretard, and VaxHerd are well familiar with.

#SuckUpMore

[bagster]

The Anti-Vax loons would bestow a Hero title on Jeffery Dalhmer if he agreed with their assertions.

And you would bestow hero status on Fauci, Soros, and Gates if they agreed with yours. Oh, wait. They do.

[David Chase]

I’m not pro vax.

I’m anti-kook, if that helps.

The dominate Variant strains go around the present Covid-19 vaccine.

The Original Covid-19 has diminished and burned itself out, as expected.

There is no need at this point to get vaccinated as there is no indication the present Covid-19 vaccine even lessens the symptoms of a Variant.

My comment that upset you and your comrades spoke to behavior more than substance. But insanity does play a role for the World to see.

Q however is the virus. The Anti-Vax obsessed are the Variants.

All we can do is wait them out. Wait and hope immunities can develop.
If not, then they will kill their host.