Well, if you have a list handy....
ThankQ in advance.
Posted on 08/16/2022 9:39:23 AM PDT by ransomnote
Well, if you have a list handy....
ThankQ in advance.
No serious person could be bothered.
So I take it you're a serious person?
#UMadBruh
#WangoZeeTango
Re:216 - not on this thread it’s not. On this thread, only one type of information is given the imprimatur. I’ll let you figure out what that type is.
Very well said.
No, it’s not paranoid to wonder cui bono. Obviously it’s in the lefties’ interest to divide us and to smear all of us as “the Party of QAnon”. It’s already started:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-party-of-lincoln-belongs-to-qanon-now-thanks-donald-trump
Actually, it started way back, and it will get worse.
The Dems even announced outright at the beginning of last year that tying Republicans to Q is their strategy for the midterms:
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/02/qanon-gop-465157
I had a Nurse in the Cardiac ICU ask for my help. I was not even assigned to that Unit on that particular day. I happened to be there for some reason which I cannot recall. We rotated shifts and perhaps I was Trauma that day. We bring patients up from the ER and stabilize them, typically following a CT Scan or perhaps an MRI. I honestly do not recall that particular day. It was 18 months ago or so.
Anyhow, most of the Nurses knew me, and she was almost frantic regarding her patient. I went into the room and the Pt was quite hypertensive. Cannot say exactly but it was likely 180-120, something like that, maybe higher. The Nurse, a young acquaintance was unsettled, as above.
I altered the vent settings. I would be lying if I said that I remembered exactly what they were, but seriously elevated. I think that it was probably Vol. AC with a rate of 14 and a Vt of around 450-500. FIO2 almost always 100 under such conditions, PEEP usually 5. Those are what we refer to as ‘vanilla’ and anything else would be surprising.
I looked at the PIPs and the exhaled volumes. I cannot recall what I did but I likely I switched to a Pressure mode in order to decrease the PIPs. Whatever I did, the BP normalized within just a few moments. That young Nurse was ecstatic. She went to the Resident and he almost immediately wrote the order. I fixed the problem.
Note: In my place, we had a lot of leeway. We would tweak things, watch the result, then get the orders written. Technically that is illegal, but because it was a teaching hospital, we did such things almost routinely.
Everyone was happy with me that day up there in the CCU, but it was not even my Unit.
Oh God I loved that job so much.
To say nothing at all, as per usual.
I'm quite sure they appreciate your assistance in their endeavor.
It’s obvious they don’t care what the truth is, what the facts are. They live to fling insults and false accusations. It’s how they get their jollies.
Like most “normies” I usually ignore these vaxx doomer threads and just let them die in their little echo chambers of 8 or 9 posts. But now and then, it seems someone needs to challenge some of these dubious (at best) claims or it makes FR look bad.
It is tiresome when they keep making vax doomer posts on threads that have nothing by to do with Covid or the vaccines, though.
I recommend you recruit someone better at it than you.
#YouAreFail
“Exactly. I mean that I’m going to let him go ahead, choose his rope, test its strength, cut off the right length, tie the noose, insert his head and grin. I can do what little else is required.”
Here's your supposed kill shot.
Not only is it 11 miscarriages (not 20) but the total number of pregnancies is unknown because only 3 of the women who miscarried are on the list of the 50 who became pregnant after the first dose. As the trial excluded pregnant women, there must have been an unknown (as yet) number who were pregnant without realizing it before the first dose. Perhaps there is yet another table of women who became pregnant after the second dose. Whichever, 8 of the women who miscarried are missing from the list of 50. Therefore, the total number of pregnant women is unknown at this time.
How does a woman who is not pregnant, have a miscarriage?
Oh, right. Maybe the Kaitlyn Jenners of the world. (*snicker*)
This is what is known in technical terms as "lousy record keeping."
Are the other 8 part of the trial or not?
And if the records are so lousy that they're losing track of 8 of 11 miscarriages, what good is the study in the first place?
Remember, it was Pfizer's study in the first place.
Your first link to "other studies" is more or less an editorial from "Public Health Communications Collaborative" which was founded in August 2020 in part by the CDC "to provide unbiased communication about the COVID-19 pandemic." Source, their own web page: https://publichealthcollaborative.org/about/
In other words, it is literally a government propaganda outlet.
Yeah, the CDC of Fauci and Birx and Wallensky.
Top Kek.
The CIDRAP Link is a hot mess. They quote from JAMA on a study of ~105k pregnancies.
Note the following:
1) they only cover women who get the jab less than 20 weeks' gestation.
2) they only looked for abortion within 28 days of the jab.
3) The adjusted odds ratio was 1.02 for abortion if women got the jab.
(Note at the 95% percent confidence level, the real odds ratio could have been as low as 96% or as high as 108%).
Oh, yes, and they had to issue a correction online, since they switched the column headings (ongoing pregnancies vs. spontaneous abortions) in the first published edition.
But ...muh JAMA. Because SCIENCE!
And they also quote from a letter to NEJM.
For participants in the V-safe Covid Vaccine Pregnancy Registry;
all of whom got the jab.
The cumulative risk of abortion between 6 and 20 weeks gestation, was 14.1% (95% confidence interval was 12.1% - 16.1% ; when they age-adjusted to the reference population, it became 12.8% (95% CI, 10.8 to 14.8%).
Only one little thing (besides only following for 14 weeks out of pregnancy). No control group. So they fudged by comparing to other historical groups to "guesstimate" upper and lower ranges for spontaneous abortion in pregnancy; no effort at matching by age, or ethnicity, or anything like that.
Guess where 12 out of the 13 authors came from?
Yeah, the CDC.
Suck on it, troll.
That's just the kind of thing Liz Cheney said about Trump voters, and look where that got her.
Sucks to be you troll.
I noticed there's no proof for that fairytale claim, about "Freepers" (can't even get FReepers right....geez) ;-)
I guess TrollHerd here, being a n00b, missed all the fun when a bunch of evolutionists left FR and formed Darwin Central.
A lot of them were fine conservatives, and contributed a lot in donations.
But they took the slamming of Christians too far, given that FR is a “pro-God site” according to the founder.
And she also missed out on the legendary Bug-Zapper thread, when a bunch of people who had been pushing Guiliani for President, got shown the door.
(Wonder if she’s a Fedophile or CDC lackey, given when she showed up.)
That's it, I'm invoking the mercy rule.
I know, cause I'm a zoologist (cause I took a zoology class). Hey, if it's good enough for gas_dr.
Maybe you otter take another look at that critter...
Thanks GW.
Impressive!
~Easy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.