I like bitt’s tease above.
Marker 5.
I can buy the marker 5 idea. It’s worth pursing. But I think Q did more than remedy a mistake in 4353.
‘War[e]fare’ misspelling unintentional.
On the move.
I think Q was telling us, “hey this is what you look to for comms to make map connections”. That’s why Anons always jump on misspellings.
Other times [e] was used.
1559
Viv[a] vs Viv[e]
733
What was the location of [E][pic posted other board]?
(I believe this one to be in relation to the airport pictures and Terminal E.
704
[e]
(Short and sweet, right? It must be very important.)
144
How are people inform[e]d?
Why was Sarah A. C. attacked (hack-attempt)?
Why was Op[e]ration Mockingbird repeated?
(Now that I think about it Mockingbird seems to be mentioned a lot lately).
Anyway, that’s the data. We can discuss hypotheses.
There is no “Marker [5]” mentioned in the drops to my knowledge.
Only “Marker [1] (505, 3231, and 3232 as a repost), Marker [2] (3232), and Marker [9] (3717 & 3716) specifically are written.
3092 has “[Marker 1 Complete]”.
1464 has “1:07 [Marker]”.
There are 33 posts with the word “marker”.
Interestingly, back to bitts musings) Drop 704 and 704 together may support e=5 vector. hypotheses.
704
[e]
705
[5]