|
Posted on 08/03/2022 4:58:18 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T foldspace]
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
My first (but not first) question referred to how much of this site is devoted to “in”,
So, yes, apparently I know nothing about this thread,
which is why I asked.
If that is the most ‘semi intelligent’ response you can come up with you should not be on FreeRepublic.
Them be FRens in Arms.
You’re not our first rodeo. Just the latest to come rattle our cage.
Adults on a mission work and play here. We have each others backs.
Did you draw the short straw to be our newest troll?
We haven’t gotten as many lately, so everyone wants to play, it seems.
Do a little homework and you’ll discover that the 2000+ posts we generate
every few days here, year after year, are not all just “in” posts. And don’t
hate on us just because we want to be sure our FRens are still with us for
the rest of the movie. We’ve been through a lot together, and lost a few
along the way.
The places where all the “Q” history has been made are fond of suggesting
that “Lurking” is an excellent way to figure out who is who and what is what, without disrupting any potential Digging, Sharing, Praying, Meme-making or
Meme-Unition passing. It’s a good suggestion.
~Easy
Now scram.
Not rattling the cage, just observing some of the threads.
Troll accusing doesn’t reflect well or honestly.
~~~~~~~
Y'all need a new script. Then you wouldn't be so easy for everyone to spot.
~Easy
We know a troll when we smell one.
” I think you knew what you were doing here from the start.”
If you will look with discernment you will see that all my posts were legitimate responses; but you can point out my error, right?
“Y’all need a new script. Then you wouldn’t be so easy for everyone to spot.”
Don’t be so quick to include yourself on the side of the saints.
“Just in case there’s anyone who still thinks Tim Scott is on our side:”
Status quo. It’s all about maintaining the status quo.
Good as it gets!!
If that is the most ‘semi intelligent’ response you can manage you should not be on FreeRepublic.
Don’t try again ‘less you want to be even more a fool.
❌Tom Rice ❌John Katko ❌Fred Upton ❌Peter Meijer ❌Adam Kinzinger ❌Anthony Gonzalez
..............
That's a good start!!
Let’s take your first six posts...
Error one: Rudely accost our self sacrificing thread host in your first post, where you insinuate triviality of not only her work but everyone’s here.
Error two: Demand an answer in your second post.
Error three: “your stupid “point”?
Error four: Telling another poster to learn to spell, after misspelling “the”
in your first post.
Error five: Not caring about “whatever” we’re about.
Error six: Your programming reminded you to call us a cult, yet you’re here
pretending ignorance.
Ever notice how nice people on a mission are to those with their hearts set on
disrupting that mission?
Me neither.
~Easy
You are the one playing the fool.
I'm enjoying this.
You are too easy.
“learn to spell idjit”
I try not to respond to the children that come here to cause trouble. I acknowledge that we all occasionally make mistakes when we write, however, it appears you missed most of your grammar classes and I thought I’d offer some unsolicited assistance.
So, first of all, how you write frequently reflects on how you are viewed by the reader. Poor grammar, spelling and punctuation usually detracts from your message, and you are likely to be taken less seriously than someone who constructs a reasonably correct sentence.
Now, to start, the first letter in a sentence should be capitalized. Then, when you finish a sentence, you should end it with a period (.), a question mark (?) or maybe even an exclamation point (!).
Also, commas can be your friend, when used appropriately, to clarify your communication.
All that said, the stream of words you wrote leaves a reader to wonder just exactly what you meant to communicate.
Did you mean that you wanted the addressee to learn how to spell the word “idjit” (which seems silly, since you spelled it out yourself)?
Or, did you mean that you wanted the addressee to learn how to spell, and then made an ad hominem attack by calling him an idjit?
It’s like the old comma clarification sentence:
Did you mean “Let’s eat, grandma”?
Or, did you mean “Let’s eat grandma”? (ewwww!)
Breathlessly awaiting your witty reply, to which I will not comment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
