Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "What would they be "preempting" then? I very greatly doubt you will say "a coming attack." "

My point here remains valid, aggressor nations often use the excuse of "preemptive attack" to justify starting a war -- most recently, we've seen Russians claiming Ukraine was getting ready to attack, and that's why Russia was forced to invade.
And I'll repeat: history normally doesn't look kindly on such claims.

Now it seems you dislike comparison of Fort Sumter & Pearl Harbor, but it's you, FRiend, who used the "preemptive attack" defense.
Pearl Harbor was a Japanese "preemptive attack" while the U.S. waited patiently until after the actual attack before waging war against Japan.
I could list any number of other examples of "preemptive attacks", and show you how they didn't work out so well, if needed?

534 posted on 08/04/2022 8:58:03 AM PDT by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
Lincoln threw the first punch. The confederates simply got in the first hit.
555 posted on 08/04/2022 10:47:43 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson