Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
DiogenesLamp: "Beauregard's whole intent was to prevent the fort from attacking them at the same time the fleet did. In order to make that happen, he had to attack *BEFORE* the entire fleet showed up."

The term for that is "preemptive attack".
It's what many aggressive nations have claimed as their justification for starting wars.
But history does not usually look kindly on such aggressive nations and that is one reason why, for just one example, that the United States took no blatant military actions against the Japanese before December 7, 1941.

Oh, dear... now did I just hurt your sensitive feeeeeeeeelings?

383 posted on 08/02/2022 3:32:20 PM PDT by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
The term for that is "preemptive attack".

What would they be "preempting" then?

I very greatly doubt you will say "a coming attack."

for just one example, that the United States took no blatant military actions against the Japanese before December 7, 1941.

And here we go again with your silly effort to make Fort Sumter into Pearl Harbor. I wouldn't be surprised if your own allies cringed at this.

Oh, dear... now did I just hurt your sensitive feeeeeeeeelings?

I've got think skin. Pretty sure I can bear it.

390 posted on 08/02/2022 4:16:23 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson