Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FLASHBACK: IT and Data Experts Identified Material Fraud in the 2020 Election in Georgia Where 30,000 Votes were Removed from President Trump Yet Raffensperger Certified These Fraudulent Results for Biden by 12,000 Votes Anyways
The Gateway Pundit ^ | July 17, 2022 at 8:30pm | Joe Hoft

Posted on 07/19/2022 12:25:40 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

Data experts from the Data Integrity Group identified material fraud in the 2020 Election in Georgia that would have given President Trump the lead in the state. However, this was ignored by Secretary of State Raffensperger who certified the state for Biden anyways.

Looking back at a presentation to the Georgia Senate on December 30, 2020, a group of Data experts from the Data Integrity Group identified fraud that resulted in President Biden stealing the election in the state. The state ignored this fraud and certified the election anyways.

Lynda McLaughlin from the Data Integrity Group, along with data scientists Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue, presented their results before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections.

Justin Mealey Mealey worked as an electronic warfare technician in the U.S. Navy for nine and a half years and was a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractor as a data analyst and programmer for the National Counterterrorism Center. He currently works for one of the “Big Four” accounting firms as a programmer.

Dave Lobue is a data scientist with over a decade of experience in a number of industries.

“What we have here is we actually have fraud that we can prove in this election, there was fraud in Georgia’s election, we can prove it with data,” Justin Mealey said. “The voting will of the people of Georgia is not reflected in what was certified by the Secretary of State.”

Dave Lobue shared the following in his presentation:

We objectively focused on numbers, data, and machine network systems. Based on our extensive analysis against precinct, county and state voting results we’ve identified over 40 data points where negative voting, and outright vote switching across candidates has totalled over 200,000 votes. Separately we’ve applied machine learning algoriths that are regularly used for anomoly detection of fraud and financial services that flagged over 500 precincts with over one million corresponding votes that exhibited suspicous activity.

The data analysts then went on to claim that for a candidate to receive 75% or more of all the votes in a precinct is abnormal. Receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud. Then the experts provided a chart showing that in Fulton County, Georgia alone there were 51 precincts with 90-93% of the ballots for Joe Biden, 51 precincts with 94% of the ballots for Joe Biden, 36 precincts with 95% of the ballots for Joe Biden and another 36 precincts with 96 to 100% of the ballots for Joe Biden. Overall, over 150 precincts in Fulton County voted 90% plus for Biden which was over 152,000 Biden votes. This was clearly suspicious or outright fraudulent activity.

The data experts next presented data on DeKalb County. In 94 precincts Biden received 90% or more of the vote. Again, this was suspicious or fraudulent activity.

Then the experts discussed Dodge County where 7,008 votes were removed from President Trump’s vote totals. In Putnam County where 5,935 votes were removed from President Trump’s totals and Dougherty County 17,650 votes were removed from President Trump. In total in these counties, President Trump had over 30,000 votes disappear.

These same analysts show that in Fulton County there were 12,173 ballots that were switched from Trump to Biden. Combined with the votes that disappeared, there are more than 50,000 Trump votes that were eliminated from the certified results in Georgia – more than enough for Trump to win the election in Georgia.

Next, the analysts talk about how your vote eventually makes it to the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets. After you check in at a poll pad, you make your choices and then cast your vote and a ballot image is created on your machine. When the polls close SD cards containing all the ballot images are removed from the terminals and transported by car to a drop-off location. Then they are transferred by police escort to an election warehouse.

Inside the warehouse, the SD cards are run through tabulation software like Dominion’s Democracy Suite. The ballots are counted at this time and forwarded to a Dominion server that inserts those totals into a SQL server database. From that point, it’s directly transmitted to the SCTYL election night reporting server. This server transmits the totals to the secretary of state and data aggregators like Edison for reporting to the mainstream media.

In the data entry process for county updates, the following options are available to anyone with access to these computers working with election software as noted in the middle box in the diagram below. These users can create new batches, reject batches, validate batches and validate and publish batches. Anyone with access to the system at this point can manipulate and create large batches of votes.

The experts in Georgia used the SCYTL source data and the New York Times Edison data as noted in the chart below.

There is no manual interface in the process involved above because data is moved between machines and accumulated, it’s not manually tabulated by individuals. Therefore the data showing the 50,000 ballots netted from President Trump was done through the machines. At no point in this process should President Trump’s votes be reduced. This is an incremental process and not a decremental one. To date, there has been no rationale for why all these ballots were reduced from President Trump.

Finally, for the ballots that were adjudicated, the original image is deleted and replaced with the new image. The original image is gone forever. Therefore the ballot recount didn’t include the original ballot images that were previously destroyed. Also, from an audit perspective, we have no idea who made the changes and created the new images.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2020electionfraud; 2020elections; electionfraud; gaywaypundit; sodomyblog; stolenelection; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: unixfox

Several states are working on shoring up the integrity of their elections. There has been progress. . . but not enough. Maybe, just maybe, if progress continues, we won’t be doomed to rigged elections from now on. THAT would be a difference . . . more so than refusing to vote because we believe all elections are rigged.


21 posted on 07/19/2022 1:49:56 PM PDT by RatRipper (The Biden Adm is leading an attack against US citizens . . . pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
And at this point what difference does it make?

It shows how electoral fraud works. This is critical information. The traditional electoral procedure that was executed before computers by hand, requiring bipartisan witnesses for every action, was itself designed by analyzing more primitive weak points that led to electoral fraud.

Analysis doesn't just reveal weak points. It suggests strategies, policies, rules, laws, and penalties that will narrow the range of fraud--which "you have always with you."

This isn't about court proceedings, although they occasionally can be a good venue for vetting allegations of fact. An election is a contest for power. Therefore, it's a form of warfare. Do you stop studying battles of the past, or do you write whole treatises about them to inform your strategists for the next 2,000 years? Ask Caesar. Sun Tzu. Napoleon. Rommel. Patton.

22 posted on 07/19/2022 2:01:32 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The SCOTUS idea of no standing huh Moe.


23 posted on 07/19/2022 3:33:07 PM PDT by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I don't know that this really proves it. Computers are only as good as the people who feed them information. But, this is another piece of evidence. There are other things that more or less prove fraud and a stolen election and when you take all of these together. I think that a stolen election is very likely.
24 posted on 07/19/2022 5:37:52 PM PDT by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
I agree...too late. I know they cheated...many also know.

The election was stolen NO doubt in my mind.

25 posted on 07/19/2022 5:44:43 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Had a tag line a couple times....maybe have another someday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Thank you Hillary!!~!


26 posted on 07/19/2022 5:48:11 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Had a tag line a couple times....maybe have another someday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

Why too late for that?


27 posted on 07/19/2022 9:21:16 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

This is Constitutional crisis-level damage. It had better not be too late.

93 percent of registered voters, only in 2020, remember; prior average for a century before that was about 45 percent.


28 posted on 07/19/2022 9:25:10 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
It had better not be too late.

Are you kidding? Do you really think that at this point in the "election cycle" someone possessed of the ability, honesty and raw power to turn the whole process on its ear is going to step forward and gitter done??

Have you been asleep for the last two years?

29 posted on 07/19/2022 9:48:40 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Won’t take one person. But if nothing happens, get used to Obama’s dystopia. Seems like it isn’t nothing happening, though, although it’s moving slower than for most of our patience.


30 posted on 07/19/2022 9:53:47 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Two words for you, sir.

Gateway Pundit.

31 posted on 07/19/2022 10:07:45 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey
Argumentum ad lapidem.

JFTR, I did not get those numbers in post #28 from the Gay-way website, but from the government’s own statistics.
32 posted on 07/19/2022 10:28:12 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Fear not. The fraud machine is running at full speed in Georgia for 2022.


33 posted on 07/20/2022 6:45:56 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
FTR, I did not get those numbers in post #28 from the Gay-way website, but from the government’s own statistics.

See? Now that makes ALL the diference. 'Cause we all know the government never lies.

You don't need to grouse and whine to me. Run this thing to the end, overturn the election, and make us all happy.

I'll bring the truckload of champaign.

34 posted on 07/21/2022 9:12:58 PM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

With respect to the point you’re trying to raise (it certainly is valid to question the statistics, preferably with an alternative to present), how many registered voters do you say there really are in the USA, and how does that measure against the historical average and the claimed average in 2020 alone?

It’s not about the pro-Constitutional people “overturning” the election, but the righting of the election. The left has overturned it, and even by using the word “overturn” they admit they’ve done it, never mind the other outstanding matters.


35 posted on 07/21/2022 10:24:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
With respect to the point you’re trying to raise (it certainly is valid to question the statistics, preferably with an alternative to present), how many registered voters do you say there really are in the USA, and how does that measure against the historical average and the claimed average in 2020 alone?

ZZZZ--snort?! Wassat? You say something? Wha...oh, yeah, oh sure, nothing could be more, uh...uh...oh yes! Definitely!

Carry on, by golly!

36 posted on 07/22/2022 7:49:11 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Ah; so you want to keep pushing the lib media line, i.e. you’re opusing. Gotcha. Well, have a nice day . . .


37 posted on 07/22/2022 10:16:16 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Corrupt Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger Wants to Destroy Georgia Elections Forever with Ranked Choice Voting
38 posted on 12/13/2022 5:07:36 PM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Julie Kelly

https://nitter.allella.fr/julie_kelly2/status/1602829913526079490#m


39 posted on 12/13/2022 5:09:38 PM PST by combat_boots ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson