[BereanBrain]

Dark Matter is Dumb Science.

here’s why.

We have an equation on how the big bang “works”. You have to have a mass of for example X for the Big Bang to ever occur. But we seen in the known universe, a pitiful FRACTION of this mass (like less than 1%). So since we “KNOW” the universe was formed from the Big Bang, there MUST be dark matter (and energy) we cannot see..

Once you start lying, saying you know things you just suspect and cannot prove, the lies just multiply.

[TexasGator]

“Once you start lying, saying you know things you just suspect and cannot prove, the lies just multiply.”

What are you doing on a science thread?

[Samurai_Jack]

Well, It’s not really ‘dumb science’. It’s just dumb reporting. When they say it’s Dark Matter what they’re saying is that they don’t know what it is. They calculate that there’s something missing, and they do not know what. So they call it ‘Dark Matter’ because it’s easier for people to understand. The really interesting part is the future.

There was in the 1700’s a french mathematician Bernoulli who studied fluid dynamics observed that an increase in the speed of fluid resulted in a decrease in static pressure. At the time they thought, oh... useful for measuring blood pressure. Who’d have thought that they’d use it to shape the wing and lift an airplane off the ground. We are ‘observing’ a missing component of physics. We’ve no idea what humanity will do with the knowledge once we find out what ‘Dark Matter’ is!

But one thing we do know...
Jeremiah 17:9
“The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?”

[xp38]

Sort of like Fredo in the Godfather

[Right_Wing_Madman]

Dark Matter is Dumb Science. here’s why. We have an equation on how the big bang “works”.

Leave aside the Big Bang for a minute, the problem is that Newton's laws of physics break down when we observe galaxies. There are two critical observations that currently have no explanation:

1. The gravitation pull of a galaxy is about six times the strength it should be.

2. The stars on the outer rim of a galaxy move at the same speed as stars closer to its massive black hole center. Newton says these outer stars should move much slower. For example, Pluto revolves around the sun much slower than Mercury - Newton is good here.

So far, there are two main theories to predict this phenomenon:

1. There is dark matter we haven't found yet that explains the gravitational irregularities of galaxies.

2. The laws of gravity change when we get to big structures like galaxies.

The point of this article is that the second theory is gaining popularity among physicists. So you may end up being right: dark matter is BS.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "Once you start lying, saying you know things you just suspect and cannot prove, the lies just multiply."

Yeap. They simple dig deeper and deeper.
They will not admit to other lies that would help their argument. That Stars are not a gas they have a lithosphere.
No way... they can't start telling the truth. They would rather dig a deeper hole.

The more we learn about science the more you realize nearly all sciences are built on lies. it's really sad

[mlo]

"We have an equation on how the big bang “works”. You have to have a mass of for example X for the Big Bang to ever occur."

No it's not about the Big Bang.

"Once you start lying, saying you know things you just suspect and cannot prove, the lies just multiply."

Nobody is lying or saying they know things they don't. Scientists have proposed ideas. That's how science works. Nobody is saying these ideas are facts. That's precisely the point.