Replies

Certainly, and there has never been, in my knowledge, any objection to any legitimate medical treatment needed to protect the life of the mother that results in the death of the fetus.

As far as I know, "Abortion" is not a legitimately prescribed medical treatment for any complications of pregnancy, other than inconvenience.

I am a male, so if my uncderstanding is incorrect, I would appreciate being corrected.

That said, to my mind, the proper place for a young girl with a complicated pregnancy, one with possible serious health concerns, is in a hospital, and not some shitty ghetto abortion mill.

Quite frankly, a pregnant 10 year old should become a protected state witness to the most disguting kind of crime I could imagine, and should be cared for by every resource of the state to facilitate the punishment of the criminal responsible.

As far as I know, "Abortion" is not a legitimately prescribed medical treatment for any complications of pregnancy

According to what I've been reading, the term "abortion" seems to be an umbrella term used for many different things: For example, if a baby dies in utero, but the uterus does not expel the baby's remains, the baby's remains will need to be removed via an "abortion" (or the mother may become very sick and die).

Who knows whether this story of a pregnant 10yo girl is true, but it wouldn't be the first time a 10-year-old became pregnant. Hard to imagine a little girl's body could handle a full-term pregnancy. This is a very sad case, if it's true.