Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
He's always interesting, IMHO, but he's doing some straw man crap I didn't care for.

Henry V beat the French by maneuver, leading them into a spot with favorable ground for himself, and took the time to set the whole thing up. Also, there was indeed turmoil in the French succession, and the French at Agincourt were arguing about who should lead the battle.

Henry V's victory wasn't unprecedented -- in the prior century, Edward III had similarly used the longbow to defeat the French at Crecy.
the Agincourt keyword, sorted:

3 posted on 06/06/2022 1:47:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Correct plus people forget what a powerful weapon that the longbow was at the time. Your longbowman not only had to have incredible arm strength but extra arm length.

The only weapon that was even close to effective was the crossbow, which suffered both from much longer reload time and shorter range.

It was a similar situation to the Kentucky long rifles at the battle of New Orleans where the Brits had an extraordinarily long kill zone to march across before they could even get within range.

9 posted on 06/06/2022 2:27:08 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson