Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chirac and Blair trade insults (AGINCOURT TIME ALERT)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | October 29, 2002 | Toby Helm and Philip Delves Broughton

Posted on 10/28/2002 11:42:11 PM PST by MadIvan

President Chirac has threatened to cancel a Franco-British summit following a slanging match with Tony Blair over the future of Europe's £30 billion-a-year Common Agricultural Policy.

Suits me, Jacques. I haven't had anything worth repeating in polite company to say to you lot in years - Ivan

The row is one of the most serious between a British Prime Minister and a fellow EU leader since Margaret Thatcher attacked Helmut Kohl and François Mitterrand over their plans for a single currency in the late 1980s.

As details emerged yesterday of the confrontation at last Friday's EU summit in Brussels, neither Downing Street nor the Elysée Palace tried to deny that heated exchanges had taken place.

Downing Street's decision to forgo normal diplomatic niceties and admit the row, was seen by Tory MPs as evidence that Mr Blair was trying to distract attention from a French success in preserving the farm subsidy regime.

Possibly. Also you win popularity with the British public by bashing the French. I have to admit, I am smiling at the thought of us giving the French another thrashing. - Ivan

The argument flared in front of other EU leaders in the middle of the Brussels meeting after Mr Blair accused M Chirac of trying to renege on a commitment to reform farm policy in 2004.

M Chirac, who strongly defends the policy because France is the chief beneficiary, reportedly told Mr Blair: "You have been very rude and I have never been spoken to like this before."

The Prime Minister must have said something to Chirac directly rather than went off on a philosophical tangent to nowhere, as the French prefer - Ivan

He also made clear to Mr Blair that in light of their disagreements he was not sure it would be a good idea to go ahead with a planned mini-summit at Le Touquet, scheduled for late November or early December.

Mr Blair's spokesman refused to confirm details of what had been said during what was being dubbed in Westminster as "le row". But he admitted that strong opinions had been aired.

"I am not going to get into particular comments or private conversations but, yes, there were vigorous exchanges," he said.

"You expect that at European councils because people have their own country's interests to speak up for and sometimes that does mean speaking up vigorously".

Later the spokesman said it would be up to the French to make arrangements for the Le Touquet meeting as it was their turn to host a get-together. But he appeared to cast doubt on it going ahead.

"It was hoped that there would be one before the end of the year," he said.

Although the spat surprised officials it is not the first time M Chirac has rounded on Britain at a summit.

When he was prime minister in 1988 he swore at Mrs Thatcher during an argument over agricultural subsidies, accusing her of talking "balls". Helmut Kohl, then German chancellor, asked him to withdraw the remarks.

Mr Blair discovered on arrival at the Brussels meeting that M Chirac and Gerhard Schröder, the German chancellor, had already struck a deal to keep CAP spending at around its present levels until 2013.

The Prime Minister was furious not only because he was excluded by Europe's two biggest power brokers, but by what they had decided behind his back.

Mr Blair had called for a root and branch reform of CAP and viewed the deal as a ploy by the French to dodge a 1999 commitment by EU leaders for a revamp in 2004.

Adding insult to injury, M Chirac also used the summit to renew his demand that Britain give up its £1.8 billion rebate from the EU budget.

We pay a great deal more into the EU budget than we get out of it. Drop dead, Jacques. - Ivan

British officials claimed that Mr Blair had won in the end, securing by the time the summit wound up a new commitment to look at CAP in 2004.

In a statement to the Commons yesterday, Mr Blair took aim at the French again when he told MPs: "In our view such a blanket opposition to reform would have been wholly unacceptable."

He denied Conservative charges that he had been out-foxed by M Chirac, insisting that Britain's commitments to enlargement of the EU and reform of CAP to help pay for it, remained on track.

Iain Duncan Smith mocked Mr Blair over his regular insistence that Labour had put Britain "at the heart of Europe" shaping its decision-making. This had been exposed as "nonsense".

"A deal to extend the life of CAP has been struck behind Britain's back," said the Tory leader.

On Britain's rebate, Mr Blair pledged: "No, it's not up for grabs." Britain had stood firm in the past and would do so again.

Diplomats said the argument between London and Paris over CAP was one of many.

Downing Street is frustrated by France's refusal to back a United Nations resolution on Iraq that would open the way for military action to topple Saddam Hussein if weapons inspections failed or were obstructed.

There are also tensions over the development of Europe's foreign and security policy.

"The problem is that Chirac is Chirac," said one EU diplomat. "He has recently been re-elected and he is throwing his weight around. It is all very, very French."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: agincourt; blair; brussels; chirac; crecy; eu; france; trafalgar; uk; waterloo
Quite.

The average family in Britain pays an addition £1500 on their food bill because of the Common Agricultural Policy and to maintain French farmers. To add insult to injury, the price of food is calculated into welfare payments. The CAP has to go and immediately.

The French have been behaving disgracefully lately between this and Iraq. I wonder if President Bush could be persuaded to put them into the Axis of Evil? ;)

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 10/28/2002 11:42:11 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty; widgysoft; Da_Shrimp; BlueAngel; JeanS; schmelvin; MJY1288; terilyn; Ryle; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 10/28/2002 11:42:43 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I like your posts Ivan and I like the British not bowing to the "Diktat" of the EU. In the family we call Mr. Chirac simply "Jacqouille la Fripouille".
3 posted on 10/29/2002 12:37:57 AM PST by ch.man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ch.man
I admire your country tremendously for not bowing to the EU and consistently rejecting joining. Keep it up, you are an inspiration to us all.

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 10/29/2002 12:38:57 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Well I certainly hope it will stay that way for a long time, but as you probably know, socialist forces are at work to sell the country ASAP...
5 posted on 10/29/2002 12:43:29 AM PST by ch.man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Instead of joining the United States of Europe, why not join the United States of America?
6 posted on 10/29/2002 12:51:27 AM PST by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The French have been behaving disgracefully lately between this and Iraq. I wonder if President Bush could be persuaded to put them into the Axis of Evil?

Personally, if I were W, I'd send an email to Chirac with a white flag of surrender, superimposed over the French flag. The next photo would be that of the American and British flags aligned side-by-side. The note would read, "Get out of the way. We got a Texan in charge now." Signed, George W. Bush.

7 posted on 10/29/2002 12:57:30 AM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Speaking of Agincourt, supposedly the well-known 'bird' or middle finger gesture as a token of extreme contempt dates from that famous battle.

The French served notice that any English longbowman who might be caught would be penalized by losing his middle finger, thus making him useless for archery. When the English stomped all over the French (as usual), they expressed their disrespect for their prisoners by prominently displaying their intact middle fingers.

I'd like to see Tony Blair flip Chirac the bird, right to his face.

-ccm

8 posted on 10/29/2002 1:26:48 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
No surprises here. When you hop in bed with a pig, you're going to get muddy.
9 posted on 10/29/2002 2:49:19 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Your mother was a hampster and your father sinks of elderberries. Go away or I shall taut you a second time.

... I did it from memory ... how did I do?

10 posted on 10/29/2002 3:10:50 AM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
ping
11 posted on 10/29/2002 4:35:57 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
Oh well, time to teach the Frogs another lesson...

Be Seeing You,

Chris

12 posted on 10/29/2002 4:51:27 AM PST by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; ccmay
Great to see Blair standing up for our interests. I find it hard to believe he's Labour, sometimes!

Speaking of Agincourt, supposedly the well-known 'bird' or middle finger gesture as a token of extreme contempt dates from that famous battle.

The French served notice that any English longbowman who might be caught would be penalized by losing his middle finger, thus making him useless for archery.

Actually, in England it's a two-fingered gesture, performed palm inwards with index and middle finger raised. These days it simply means "F*** You". The French threatened to cut off index and middle fingers, since these are the two used to draw the longbow.

13 posted on 10/29/2002 5:44:33 AM PST by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp
Comes from "pluck yew" meethinks, since the longbow were
made from Yew??
14 posted on 10/29/2002 6:17:10 AM PST by chilepepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
While I hesitate to question your figures, the 1500 pound per family seems unbelievable. That is over $2300. I can't see how even mind-numbed socialist robots could accept that with nothing valuable in return.
15 posted on 10/29/2002 6:30:37 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
If my history doesn't desert me Agincourt was a prelude to the Maginot line debacle. The frilly french insisted on riding heavy horse in full armor in deep mud. The ones the archers didn't get were knifed in the lungs and heart by English page boys. The french however got the last laugh by building a profitable museum dedicated to their defeat! It must be tough to think that you are great and have frog history to live down to.
16 posted on 10/29/2002 7:32:26 AM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I hope Tony bich slaps her!
17 posted on 10/29/2002 7:34:06 AM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Da_Shrimp
Actually, in England it's a two-fingered gesture, performed palm inwards with index and middle finger raised.

You're absolutely right. I had forgotten that.

-ccm

18 posted on 10/29/2002 8:18:23 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper
Comes from "pluck yew" meethinks, since the longbow were made from Yew??

You could well be right. As an aside, I remember reading somewhere that the origin of the word 'f***' is fairly obscure: although often referred to as Anglo-Saxon in origin, there apparantly isn't much evidence for its early use.

19 posted on 10/29/2002 8:58:36 AM PST by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
This should do your heart some good. Best piece of Britain vs. France literature since The Bard wrote Henry V.

World Wide Web Fights Grudge Match--English Soccer Hooligans vs. The French Army

20 posted on 10/29/2002 6:22:37 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson