[philman_36]

Now, if you have a relevant case, then present it. BUT, it has to be an American case that is AFTER Wong Kim Ark, not before, and of a USSC level.

Why bother? As I've just shown, the 14th Amendment was
for former slaves. Was Mr. Ark a former slave?
As you yourself said earlier...Courts are wrong all the time
Wong Kim Ark was decided wrongly.

[Penelope Dreadful]

So in other words, you ain’t got nothing.

And you, opining that “the 14th Amendment was
for former slaves. Was Mr. Ark a former slave?”

Wow, that is rich! NO, Mr. Ark was NOT a former slave, and yet the Court found that the 14th Amendment applied to him.

Rather than you having a learnable moment and saying, “Gee, maybe I do not know what I was talking about, and the 14th Amendment does not just apply to former slaves - rather than you saying that and admitting that you don’t know what you are talking about - you will simply state Wong Kim Ark was decided wrongly.

Dude, you are living inside your own head. You would make a great Democrat! You know - Men can get pregnant too! Go for it! You are well on your way!