Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

So in other words, you ain’t got nothing.

And you, opining that “the 14th Amendment was
for former slaves. Was Mr. Ark a former slave?”

Wow, that is rich! NO, Mr. Ark was NOT a former slave, and yet the Court found that the 14th Amendment applied to him.

Rather than you having a learnable moment and saying, “Gee, maybe I do not know what I was talking about, and the 14th Amendment does not just apply to former slaves - rather than you saying that and admitting that you don’t know what you are talking about - you will simply state Wong Kim Ark was decided wrongly.

Dude, you are living inside your own head. You would make a great Democrat! You know - Men can get pregnant too! Go for it! You are well on your way!


64 posted on 06/03/2022 5:18:10 PM PDT by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Penelope Dreadful
NO, Mr. Ark was NOT a former slave, and yet the Court found that the 14th Amendment applied to him.

And the courts are never wrong...right?

66 posted on 06/03/2022 5:38:43 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Penelope Dreadful
That's why I asked if you thought 8 USC was what granted NBC status.
You went the other way. That's cool.
67 posted on 06/03/2022 5:41:57 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson